Construction / Energy / Real Estate Litigation

Our team of professionals strives to deliver legal services with uncommon insight, efficiency and understanding.  We believe we should deliver legal services in a manner similar to managing your most complex construction projects – with clearly defined goals, with strategic vision, with a coordinated team approach, and with a schedule and budget that are achievable. 

 

We counsel clients from project inception to project completion and beyond.   Perspective gained from working with the many different professionals involved in construction, real estate, and energy projects provides our team with a  better opportunity to understand disputes that may arise, avoid such disputes altogether, or assist in the efficient resolution of disputes when circumstances require.   On the projects in which we are engaged, we are advocates and offer sound practical judgment, but most of all, we seek to be partners with our clients so that their goals and visions can be met efficiently, and their needs satisfied.     

 

Related areas include: 

  • Bid protests and bid preparation
  • DBE/MBE/WBE compliance issues
  • Insurance procurement and coverage issues
  • Contract drafting / negotiation
  • Project management assistance
  • Change order evaluation and claims assistance
  • Claims for payment
  • Claims involving public owners and public/private partnerships
  • Delay and disruption claims
  • Prompt payment claims
  • Lien and bond claims
  • Construction defect claims
  • Claims involving design professionals
  • Warranty claims
  • Claims involving personal injuries
  • Real property disputes involving ownership rights
  • Property tax appeals

 

Industries we serve 

  • Power
  • Industrial
  • Infrastructure
  • Water Infrastructure
  • Insurance coverage
  • Hospitality
  • High-end residential
  • Construction financing
  • Commercial
  • Sport Facilities
  • Transportation

Notable Experience

 

Power
  • Represented an international power generating company prosecuting construction deficiencies in the construction of a coal-fired power plant in Puerto Rico. 
  • Enforced liquidated damages recovery and defended against multiple change order requests by international supplier to EPC contractor, in connection with fabrication and delivery of HRSG components to power generating facility.
  • Obtained favorable settlement, day before starting jury trial, for EPC contractor on claims of defective performance and delay to project by structural steel subcontractor/fabricator.

Industrial
  • Negotiated resolution of $100 million in claims in connection with design-build contract for industrial plant constructed for international owner-operator. 
  • Represented an ENR Top 3 engineer in connection with a mine roof collapse; positioned the case such that despite being the target defendant, the case settled with a contribution from our client of less than 10 percent of the damages asserted in the lawsuit. 
  • Represented the general contractor for design and retooling of automotive plant paint lines in a complex lawsuit by many liening subcontractors, following owner nonpayment; conducted early mediation and successfully resolved all claims.

Infrastructure
  • Successfully resolved by mediation claims against design engineer on sewer work treatment project. Municipal owner claimed design defects caused premature corrosion of sewer pipe resulting in damages exceeding $3 million. 
  • Prosecuted claims against joint venture partner for accounting and extra work payment obtaining favorable jury verdicts in two trials.

Water Infrastructure
  • Defended design engineer against allegations of professional negligence and breach of contract by owner seeking $20 million in damages. Jury verdicts were obtained in favor of client on all counts.

Insurance Coverage 
  • Power Sector – Jury verdict in excess of $23 million on builder’s risk policy claim for inefficiency and out of sequence work costs, after two heat recovery steam generators were damaged in ocean transit from Japan to a power plant in Missouri. In related action, also won summary judgment (affirmed on appeal) against the ocean cargo policy. 
  • Commercial Sector – Litigated to successful resolution for building owner against builder’s risk insurer, following denial of coverage during construction for significant damage to metallic window frames and glass curtain wall after a heavy rainfall drenched building in cementitious roofing material installed earlier that day.

Hospitality
  • Successfully negotiated construction agreement related to a $1 billion “Sports City” project located in Basra, Iraq, involving multiple parties from the United States, Jordon and Iraq. 
  • Obtained judgment (for total claim, penalty interest and attorneys fees) in favor of contractor in equitable mechanic’s lien action. Represented all mechanic’s lien holders in forcing trustee sale of the property after owner filed bankruptcy, which netted proceeds in excess of the mechanic’s lien claims. 
  • Managed multi-state litigation involving 15 related construction projects resulting in favorable summary judgments or settlement in all matters. 
  • Secured dismissal of all multi-million dollar claims against owner’s representative in large mechanic’s lien, design and construction defect litigation involving a Colorado ski resort.

High-End Residential
  • After a three-week jury trial, secured a judgment in excess of $2 million for general contractor against the owner of a condominium project and two subcontractors. Held the verdicts on appeal.

Construction Financing
  • Successfully managed litigation for an international lender on four south Florida projects and related lawsuits where the general contractor sought to supplant the priority of the lender’s security interests and sued the lender for in excess of $10 million under theory lender was acting as a joint venture partner with defunct developer.

Newsletters & E-Alerts

January 6, 2012
A new decision by the Kansas Supreme Court drastically alters the legal landscape for claims against residential home builders. David v. Hett, No. 98,416, Kan., (Kan. Dec. 30, 2011).
December 14, 2011
The US Green Building Council (USGBC) has jumped into the application world with the goals of saving time and effort in task management, data exchange, and the Leadership in Energy and Environment Design (LEED) certification process, while expanding green building across the county. With numerous LEED projects completed, under construction, and in the planning stages, USGBC has created an application lab to help users navigate their way through the LEED process.
June 2010
Contractors maintain several types of insurance to protect their businesses and to account for the risks of working on a construction project. One type of policy is a Commercial General Liability Policy (“CGL Policy”). CGL Policies generally protect the contractor where their work has caused damage to something or someone. The typical CGL Policy states that the insurance applies only to “bodily injury” and “property damage,” but only if the bodily injury or property damage are caused by an “occurrence” that takes place within the coverage territory.
February 2010
Historically, courts would not allow an unpaid subcontractor (or supplier) to assert a claim against an owner with whom they did not deal directly. However, in the last several years, cases in numerous states have created exceptions to the general rule and have held that, under certain limited circumstances, a subcontractor can recover from an owner on an implied contract theory (sometimes referred to as an unjust enrichment or quantum meruit theory).
September 2009
Since its inception in 1998, LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) has become an internationally recognized green building certification system developed by the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC).

The USGBC recently announced an overhaul of the LEED rating system in the form of “LEED 2009,” which incorporates several changes to the LEED process. The 2009 revamp initiative, which the USGBC calls LEED version 3, or LEED v3, has several new and/or revised components.
July 14, 2009
This Client Advisory details the Kansas Court of Appeals emphasis on strict adherence to mechanic's lien laws. These laws require subcontractors/lien claimants to correctly identify the name of the general contractor.
July 2009
A significant number of the courts have held that when a contractor or owner/developer suffers damages as a result of errors by a design professional, the economic loss doctrine bars negligence claims, unless such negligence causes either personal injury or damage to “other property.” What constitutes “other property” is often the central issue analyzed by the courts in these types of cases. “Economic loss” is the result of the failure of the product to perform to the level expected by the buyer, which is the core concern of traditional contract law.
May 2009
The current version of EFCA may be in trouble. However, passage of a different version, which would still favor unions, may well happen.