Polsinelli Shughart PC

In our
Construction Litigation
practice group:


Heath M. Anderson
Roy Bash
Catherine R. Bell
William D. Blakely
Kevin J. Breer
Eugene R. Commander
John S. Conner
Andrew M. DeMarea
Wayne B. Ducharme
Robert O. Dyer
Cynthia R. Estrella
Brian M. Flaherty
Natalia A. Garrett
Heber O. Gonzalez
Matthew R. Hale
Thomas K. Irvine
G. Edgar James
Ryan M. Manies
Joseph J. Mellon
William R. Meyer
Christopher J. Mohart
Brett C. Randol
Jeffrey B. Rosen
Spencer L. Sears
Craig A. Smith
Christopher P. Sobba
Michael H. Talboy
Michael D. Textor

 

To learn more about our Construction Litigation
group or to see a
complete list of our
attorneys, click here

      
 

July 2009
    

A Construction Law Client Advisory:

Kansas Court of Appeals Emphasizes Strict Adherence to Mechanic’s Lien Laws in Requiring Sub-Contractor/Lien Claimant to Correctly Identify the Name of the General Contractor

By: Kevin J. Breer

 

Recently, the Kansas Court of Appeals considered a subcontractor’s claim to enforce its mechanic’s lien. On the face of the lien statement, the subcontractor identified the general contractor as “Merit Construction Company, Inc.” The general contractor on the project, however, was “Merit General Contractors, Inc.,” a separate entity. Under K.S.A. 60-1103(a)(1), the subcontractor or supplier must correctly identify the name of the general contractor in order for the lien to be enforceable.

In this case, because the subcontractor failed to correctly identify the name of the general contractor, the Court of Appeals refused to enforce the subcontractor’s lien.

Lessons to be learned from this case are the following:

  1. If you are an owner, developer or general contractor looking for ways to invalidate a lien, check to make sure the subcontractor or supplier has correctly identified the name of the general contractor. As you can tell from the example above, the name must be exact.
       
  2. If you are a subcontractor or supplier filing a lien, you need to make sure you have performed your due diligence and checked all your contract documents to ensure you have correctly identified the name of the general contractor.

National Restoration Company v. Merit General Contractors, Inc., 2009 WL 1423570 (Kan.Ct.App. May 22, 2009).

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory, please contact Polsinelli Shughart PC Shareholder Kevin J. Breer at kbreer@polsinelli.com or 913-234-7404.


About Polsinelli Shughart PC

With more than 480 attorneys , Polsinelli Shughart PC is a national law firm that is a recognized leader in the areas of business litigation, financial services, real estate, business law, labor and employment, construction, life sciences and health care. Serving corporate, institutional and individual clients regionally, nationally and worldwide, Polsinelli Shughart is known for successfully applying forward-thinking strategies for both straightforward and complex legal matters. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com.

 
   
With offices in:

 

If you know of anyone who you believe would like to receive our e-mail updates, or if you would like to be removed from our e-distribution list, please contact Sarah Blair.

Polsinelli Shughart PC provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Nothing herein should be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances, possible changes to applicable laws, rules and regulations and other legal issues. Receipt of this material does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

Polsinelli Shughart is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

 

Copyright

Copyright © 2009 Polsinelli Shughart PC.

 
Cities Polsinelli Shughart PC