Polsinelli Shughart PC

Our Attorneys

In our
Health Care
practice group:

____________________

Janice A. Anderson
Douglas K. Anning
Mary Beth Blake
Teresa A. Brooks
Jared O. Brooner
Anne M. Cooper
Fredric J. Entin
Kara M. Friedman
Rebecca L. Frigy
Randy S. Gerber
C. Jason Hannagan
Jay M. Howard
Joan B. Killgore
Jason T. Lundy
Jane K. McCahill
Matthew J. Murer
Thomas P. O'Donnell
Daniel S. Reinberg
Randal L. Schultz
Charles P. Sheets
Sandy J. Smith
Valerie S. Smith
Carey Gehl Supple
Mark R. Woodbury

 

To learn more about our Health Care practice,
click here.

 

In our
Science & Technology
practice group:

____________________

Ari M. Bai
Randy L. Canis
Corey Casey
Elton F. Dean III
Brian B. Diekhoff
Kathryn J. Doty
Robert O. Enyard Jr.
Jeffrey E. Fine
Judith S. Heeter
Christopher L.E. Hines
Todd S. Hofmeister, Ph.D
Paul A. Jenny
Timothy J. Keefer
J. Morgan Kirley
Gregory M. Kratofil Jr.
Glenn H. Lenzen
David J. McCrosky
Lisa L. Mueller
Andrea M. Porterfield
Rebecca Riley-Varga, Ph.D
Kelley A. Schnieders
Julie A. Scott, Ph.D
Teddy C. Scott, Ph.D
Matthew J. Smith
Timothy D. Steffens
James M. Stipek
Richard P. Stitt
Lawrence A. Swain
Micah D. Trotti
Tracey S. Truitt
Patrick C. Woolley


To learn more about
our Science and
Technology group,
click here

____________________

 

 

February 2010
    

A Health Care and Science & Technology Update:

Certification Criteria for Achieving "Meaningful Use" of Electronic Health Record Technology

 

As part of the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONCHIT) released on December 30, 2009, an Interim Final Rule (IFR) that was published in the Federal Register on January 13th. That IFR detailed the initial set of standards, implementation specifications and certifications criteria that must be achieved in order to demonstrate the first stage of the “meaningful use” of electronic health record (EHR) technology and, by doing so, establish eligibility for various incentive programs.

The IFR is meant to address the digital Babylon typifying the current EHR landscape. EHR Technology is a field dominated by a mishmash of competing standards – HL7, SNOMED, ICD-9, ICD-10 PCS, ICD-10 CM, CCHIT, LOINC, NCPDP SCRIPT 5.0, NCPDP SCRIPT 8.1 and SOAP, to name a few of the more prevalent entrants. These various “standards” are promulgated by disparate certification bodies and cover either the method for the exchange of content or attempts to establish a uniform vernacular for the content itself (referred to as “code sets”). The ultimate goal of these regulations is to achieve semantic interoperability through the use of uniform standards and, eventually, settling upon a single standard in hopes of allowing for the transfer, aggregation, and efficient mining of health information across disparate and, currently, largely unlinked systems.

Under the IFR, EHR technology can be made available by suppliers in two formats – either a complete suite addressing all of ONCHIT’s certification requirements or as a modular piece addressing one or more, but not all, of the certification requirements (these incomplete modules must be combined by the eligible professionals, eligible hospitals, or third parties to meet all of the criteria in order to establish “meaningful use”). Throughout the rule, ONCHIT strikes a balance between various standards by allowing for the use of alternative criteria. ONCHIT has expressed a hope that practical experience, when paired with implementation realities, will highlight the key distinctions and advantages of the various standards, and inform the selection of the criteria ultimately chosen in later iterations and updates of the IFR. This adoption of alternative and already existing standards, rather than a single combined approach, is likely due to the time constraints under which the IFR was issued and the limited time for the first round of implementation (beginning as early as October 2010).

The proposed goals of the Stage 1 “meaningful use” criteria focused on capturing health information electronically in a unified format so that the information could be used to track key clinical decisions for care coordination purposes and clinical decision support, and also to report metrics for clinical quality measures and support public health. The key health-related information required to support those goals requires that an EHR include patient demographic and clinical health information such as medical history and problem lists and has the capacity to:

  • Provide clinical decision support;
  • Support physician order entry;
  • Capture and query information relevant to health care quality; and
  • Exchange electronic health information with, and integrate such information from, other sources.

The IFR went into effect February 12, 2010 and ONCHIT is seeking comments through March 15, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. Importantly, although the certification criteria are in place, the regulatory structure which will address the process for achieving certification and the establishment of a certification body has yet to be released but is expected in Spring of 2010.

For more information:

For further guidance on how to take full advantage of the EHR incentive programs, please contact any of the following members of the Polsinelli Shughart PC Health Care team:

For further guidance on the technical standards, implementation specifications and certifications criteria, please contact any of the following members of the Polsinelli Shughart PC Science and Technology team:


 

Polsinelli Shughart | In the News

Headlines and Bylines from polsinelli.com

To learn more about our RSS feeds, click here.

Polsinelli Shughart Expands Corporate Capabilities in Phoenix with the Addition of Attorneys Charles Berry and Michael Patterson

The Kansas City Star interviews Polsinelli Shughart Patent Attorneys about Patent Law

Achieving "Meaningful Use" of Electronic Health Records, a Health Care Update

Get more news from polsinelli.com.

Click here to learn more about our RSS feeds.

 


About Polsinelli Shughart PC

With more than 470 attorneys, Polsinelli Shughart PC is a national law firm that is a recognized leader in the areas of business litigation, financial services, bankruptcy, real estate, business law, labor and employment, construction, life sciences and health care. Serving corporate, institutional and individual clients regionally, nationally and worldwide, Polsinelli Shughart is known for successfully applying forward-thinking strategies for both straightforward and complex legal matters. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com.

   
With offices in:

 

If you know of anyone who you believe would like to receive our e-mail updates, or if you would like to be removed from our e-distribution list, please contact Sarah Dickinson.

Polsinelli Shughart PC provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Nothing herein should be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances, possible changes to applicable laws, rules and regulations and other legal issues. Receipt of this material does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

Polsinelli Shughart is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Polsinelli Shughart® is a registered trademark of Polsinelli Shughart PC.

 

Copyright

Copyright © 2010 Polsinelli Shughart PC.

 
Cities Polsinelli Shughart PC