Polsinelli Shughart PC Health Care Law and Science and Technology e-Alert

Our AttorneysAttorneys

In our
Science & Technology
practice group:

Ari M. Bai
Yu Cai, Ph.D
Randy L. Canis
Corey Casey
Elton F. Dean III
Brian B. Diekhoff
Kathryn J. Doty
Gregory P. Durbin
Robert O. Enyard Jr.
Jeffrey E. Fine
Judith S. Heeter
Christopher L.E. Hines
Todd S. Hofmeister, Ph.D
Paul A. Jenny
Timothy J. Keefer
J. Morgan Kirley
Gregory M. Kratofil Jr.
Glenn H. Lenzen
Christine Meis McAuliffe
David J. McCrosky
Lisa L. Mueller
Tara A. Nealey, Ph.D
Jay E. Pietig
Andrea M. Porterfield
Rebecca Riley-Vargas, Ph.D
Marcia J. Rodgers
Kelley A. Schnieders
Teddy C. Scott, Ph.D
Matthew J. Smith
Timothy D. Steffens
James M. Stipek
Richard P. Stitt
Lawrence A. Swain
Micah D. Trotti
Tracey S. Truitt
Michael A. Williamson
Patrick C. Woolley

 

To learn more about
or to contact a Science and
Technology attorney,
click here.

 

In our
Health Care
practice group:

Janice A. Anderson
Douglas K. Anning
Cynthia E. Berry
Mary Beth Blake
Tina M. Boschert
Gerald W. Brenneman
Teresa A. Brooks
Jared O. Brooner
Anne M. Cooper
Fredric J. Entin
Rebekah W. Francis
Kara M. Friedman
Rebecca L. Frigy
Randy S. Gerber
Jay M. Howard
George Jackson, III
Joan B. Killgore
Jason T. Lundy
Patrick J. Martinez
Jane K. McCahill
Matthew J. Murer
Edward F. Novak
Thomas P. O'Donnell
Alan K. Parver
Valerie S. Reich
Daniel S. Reinberg
Randal L. Schultz
Charles P. Sheets
Heidi R. Slaw
Sandy J. Smith
Kathryn M. Stalmack
Leah Mendelsohn Stone
Chad C. Stout
Steven K. Stranne
Emily C. Tremmel
Andrew B. Turk
Kimela R. West
Christopher K. Wilson
Mark R. Woodbury

 

To learn more about or
to contact a Health Care attorney, click here.

 

 

 

July 2010
    

A Polsinelli Shughart Update:

The Final Meaningful Use Regulations Released

 

On July 13, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released the Final Rule for the Medicare and Medicaid Electronic Health Record (EHR) Incentive Program (the Meaningful Use Final Rule). Simultaneously, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) released its Final Rule addressing certification criteria for EHRs (the Certification Criteria Final Rule). These two Final Rules establish what criteria and technical standards constitute the meaningful use of EHR technology and establish eligibility for incentive payments.

The Incentive Program:

The Meaningful Use Final Rule creates incentives across three government programs, Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS), Medicare Advantage (MA), and Medicaid, for Eligible Professionals (EPs), Eligible Hospitals (EHs) and Critical Access Hospitals (CAHs) to adopt and demonstrate meaningful use of certified EHR technology starting as early as October 2010. The program also retained its downward payment adjustments for providers who fail to adopt and demonstrate meaningful use after 2015 as well as its phased-in, three-stage approach to meaningful use.

The good news is that the Meaningful Use Final Rule is more forgiving than the proposed rule. CMS dropped its “all-or-nothing” approach and lessened the burden on providers seeking to establish meaningful use by requiring a “core” set of only 14 criteria objectives for EHs/CAHs and 15 criteria objectives for EPs, and a “menu” set of 10 criteria objectives from which providers are required to meet five of their choosing. CMS also lowered the measurement requirements associated with several of the individual criteria. Additionally, CMS simplified the rules for quality reporting, reducing the number of quality measures required to be reported by EPs and EHs. A quick reference guide to the Stage 1 meaningful use criteria is available here.

For the first payment year only, providers need only satisfy the Stage 1 criteria for any continuous 90-day period during the payment year. For the Medicare incentive, EPs can receive as much as $44,000 over a five-year period and EH payments are based on the hospital’s Medicare Part A and MA inpatient bed days, total inpatient bed days, and charges for charity care.

The Rule on Certification Criteria:

ONC’s release of the Certification Criteria Final Rule details the standards, implementation specifications, and certification criteria required for the Incentive Program’s first stage (Certification Criteria). The modifications made to the Certification Criteria focused on enhancing the clarity of the Interim Final Rule published in January. The general requirements, however, remain largely unaltered.

The Certification Criteria list the minimum capabilities certified EHR technology will be required to demonstrate to attain certification and are meant to address the digital Babylon typifying the current EHR technology landscape. The ultimate goal of the Certification Criteria is to achieve semantic interoperability through the use of a uniform set of standards in hopes of allowing for the transfer, aggregation, and efficient mining of health information across disparate and, currently, largely unlinked systems.

Throughout the Certification Criteria Final Rule, ONC strikes a balance between various standards by allowing for the use of alternative standards. ONC has expressed a hope that practical experience, when paired with implementation, business, and clinical realities, will highlight the key distinctions and advantages of the various standards and inform the selection of those ultimately chosen in Stages 2 and 3. The unified architecture under the Certification Criteria Final Rule is the basis for health care information to be used for tracking key clinical decisions for care coordination purposes among providers, clinical decision support for individual patients, and the reporting of metrics for clinical quality measures that support and inform broader public health.

The Regulations' Effect:

For many providers, meeting the meaningful use requirements will not be cheap or easy. However, because certification will create a de facto industry standard, meaningful use will likely become a regulatory requirement or practical prerequisite across virtually all future developments in the health care industry. Achieving meaningful use, therefore, presents providers with an opportunity to proactively navigate an uncertain future for the industry, while a shortsighted approach to achieving meaningful use could place a provider at a significant disadvantage in its ability to adapt in the changing marketplace.

A full analysis of the Final Rules is available here.

 

For More Information

For further guidance on how to take advantage of the opportunity presented by meaningful use certification, please contact any of the following Polsinelli Shughart PC attorneys:

For Health Care IT issues specifically, please contact the authors:

For Health Care issues, please contact:

For Science and Technology issues, please contact:

 

Polsinelli Shughart | In the News

Headlines and Bylines from polsinelli.com

To learn more about our RSS feeds, click here.

What Health Reform Means to Your Medical Practice's Health Benefits Plan

Polsinelli Shughart Builds Intellectual Property and Science and Technology Practice in Phoenix

Client Advisory - Vigorous Civil and Criminal Enforcement Will Continue to Play a Central Role in EPA’s Strategic Plan

Get more news from polsinelli.com.

 

Click here to learn more about our RSS feeds.

 

About Polsinelli Shughart PC

With more than 500 attorneys, Polsinelli Shughart PC is a national law firm that is a recognized leader in the areas of business litigation, financial services, bankruptcy, real estate, business law, labor and employment, construction, life sciences and health care. Serving corporate, institutional and individual clients regionally, nationally and worldwide, Polsinelli Shughart is known for successfully applying forward-thinking strategies for both straightforward and complex legal matters. The firm can be found online at www.polsinelli.com.

 
   
With offices in Kansas City, St. Louis, Chicago, Denver, Phoenix, Washington DC, New York, Wilmington DE, Overland Park, St. Joseph, Springfield, Jefferson City, Topeka, Edwardsville

 

If you know of anyone who you believe would like to receive our e-mail updates, or if you would like to be removed from our e-distribution list, please contact Therese O'Shea.

Polsinelli Shughart PC provides this material for informational purposes only. The material provided herein is general and is not intended to be legal advice. Nothing herein should be relied upon or used without consulting a lawyer to consider your specific circumstances, possible changes to applicable laws, rules and regulations and other legal issues. Receipt of this material does not establish an attorney-client relationship.

Polsinelli Shughart is very proud of the results we obtain for our clients, but you should know that past results do not guarantee future results; that every case is different and must be judged on its own merits; and that the choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.

Polsinelli Shughart® is a registered trademark of Polsinelli Shughart PC.

 

Copyright

Copyright © 2010 Polsinelli Shughart PC.

 
Polsinelli Shughart PC