Real Estate Finance

Polsinelli Shughart has forged a national practice and reputation in real estate finance. We regularly represent our real estate lending clients, including insurance companies, CMBS lenders, banks and other financial institutions, in acquisition, construction, bridge, permanent and mezzanine financing transactions of all sizes and complexities.

Our attorneys and paralegals have documented and closed more than 1,950 commercial mortgage loans exceeding $15 billion in principal amount in all 50 states, the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico.

We also represent our lending clients, as well as some of the largest commercial loan servicers in the country, in connection with the administration and servicing of commercial real estate mortgage loans. The scope of this representation includes the full spectrum of issues that may arise during the term of a mortgage loan, including loan modifications, extensions, assumptions, defeasance transactions, collateral substitutions, participation and intercreditor agreement issues and loan sales and purchases. Loan structures range from loans with one property, borrower and lender, to the most complex structured finance loans involving multiple properties and parties, with participations, A/B notes and multiple mezzanine tiers.

Our extensive national experience in real estate loan enforcement and bankruptcy cases gives us a bottom-line, common-sense perspective that enhances our loan origination and servicing work, and positions us for rapid, effective action when there is an impending loan default. Our attorneys have significant experience in workouts and restructuring of mortgage loans and work closely with our loan enforcement group to maximize our clients’ recoveries on troubled loans.

We supplement our extensive experience by integrating lawyers and support personnel specializing in distinct disciplines of finance, real estate, corporate, tax, securities, bankruptcy and creditor's rights - together with a nationwide network of local counsel. This translates into state-of-the-art loan and servicing documentation, and a problem-solving, proactive transaction approach focused on positive outcomes that is as borrower-friendly as possible without compromising lender and servicer interests.

Members of our real estate finance group have particular knowledge and experience in the defeasance of securitized loans. Defeasance is used in connection with refinancing a CMBS loan or a sale or other disposition of real property securing a CMBS loan and involves the substitution of U.S. government-backed securities for the real estate collateral. The obligation to make loan payments is not terminated and continues until the maturity date, but the real estate is released upon completion of the defeasance. The securities are pledged to the lender and provide the sums necessary to pay the debt when due. Our attorneys assist in all aspects of the defeasance process, including preparation of documentation, structuring the successor borrower which becomes the loan obligor after the defeasance is completed, coordinating approvals from rating agencies, advising on REMIC compliance issues and closing the transaction.

To view our Commercial Mortgage Lending Experience Map, click here.

Notable Experience

  • Represented lender in a $44 million loan to a syndicated tenants in common group secured by a medical office building in Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Represented lender in a $137 million loan secured by a shopping complex in suburban Kansas City, Missouri.
  • Represented lender in a $111 million loan secured by nine office buildings in Missouri and Kansas.
  • Represented lender in a $21 million loan secured by a mobile home park in Florida.
  • Represented lender in a $173 million loan secured by single tenant office properties in Indiana, Tennessee and Nevada.
  • Represented lender in a $34 million loan secured by mall in Puerto Rico.
  • Represented lender in an $81 million loan secured by shopping center in Fresno,
  • Represented lender in a $122 million loan secured by a portfolio of 14 medical office building properties located in 7 states. Several of the properties involved ground leases from hospitals.
  • Represented lender in a $59 million loan secured by a full service hotel in San Diego, California, involving an operating lease structure.
  • Represented Midwestern regional bank in a $40 million construction loan for the development of a shopping center in Wyandotte County, Kansas. The security for the loan includes a pledge of Tax Increment Financing bond proceeds and Transportation Development District proceeds.
  • Represented Midwestern regional bank in a $20 million acquisition loan to finance the purchase of the national headquarters of a major corporation in Johnson County, Kansas.
  • Represented lender in a $29 million construction loan for an office building in Arizona.
  • Represented lender in a $21 million loan secured by 6 retail properties in multiple states.
  • Represented lender in an $18 million loan secured by a parking facility in Chicago.
  • Represented community and regional banks in closing hundreds of mortgage loans with principal balances of $10 million or less.
  • Defeasance of loan in excess of $350 million secured by multiple properties in which note was split into two notes to allow New York style defeasance for a Virginia property and conventional defeasance for remaining properties.
  • New York style defeasance of A/B $375 million pari passu notes secured by 666 Fifth Avenue property.
  • Defeasance of three loans in aggregate amount of $625 million secured by multiple properties and held by a grantor trust.
  • New York-style defeasance of $432 million single securitization loan secured by One Liberty Plaza Building.
  • Defeasance of A/B mezzanine loans in aggregate amount of $35 million related to the 885 Third Avenue Building (the Lipstick Building) held by a CDO.
  • Partial defeasance of loan in excess of $70 million secured by multiple properties in which note was split into three notes to allow New York style partial defeasance for Florida properties and conventional partial defeasance for other properties.
  • Partial defeasance of a $276 million loan secured by over 60 properties in multiple states.
  • Defeasance of multiple loans in aggregate original principal balance in excess of $325 million involving over thirty-eight properties in multiple states.
  • Defeasance of A/B/C $213 million pari passu notes secured by Washington Center in Washington D.C.
  • Represented two loan servicers in connection with the transfer of 130 defeased loans held by successor borrowers affiliated with Capmark.
  • Represented two loan services in connection with the bankruptcy of a successor borrower holding company.
  • Represented the senior lender in the sale of a $76.5 million construction loan in connection with the sale of the newly constructed office building in Coral Gables, Florida.
  • Represented a mortgage investment company in connection with purchases or sales of more than 40 mortgage loans, split evenly between residential and commercial properties, negotiating purchase and sales agreements, and for mortgage loan purchases, investigating and analyzing loan documents, due diligence materials, and information relating to the borrowers and properties.
  • Represented the special servicer in the restructuring of an $860 million mortgage loan, secured by a hotel and casino in Las Vegas, that was beneficially owned by multiple levels of loan participants. The restructuring transaction involved severance of the mortgage note into senior and subordinate notes, the assumption of the indebtedness by a new borrowing entity involving a two-step assumption process with a subsequent transfer of the controlling equity interests in the new borrowing entity to a new sponsor and an amendment and restatement of all loan documents.
  • Represented the servicer of the securitized mortgage loan in the extension and modification of a securitized $142 million condominium conversion loan for property in Los Angeles, California. The modification involved the restructuring of various reserves, the foreclosure by the mezzanine lender of its loan and the resulting change in control of the mortgage borrower.
  • Represented the special servicer of the securitized mortgage loan in connection with the extension and modification of a securitized $380 million construction loan for property in Las Vegas, Nevada. The modification involved the restructuring of certain reserves and accommodation of a $60 million preferred equity investment into the mortgage borrower, with a resulting change in control of the mortgage borrower.
  • Represented the special servicer in connection with the extension and modification of a securitized $120 million hotel redevelopment loan for property in Los Angeles, California and the corresponding extension and modification of the $22 million mezzanine loan. The modifications involved changes in the redevelopment plans and schedules and restructuring of reserves. The modifications also accommodated a $32 million preferred equity investment in the mortgage borrower and the resulting change in control of the mortgage borrower.
  • Represented the special servicer in the modification and extension of a $782 million securitized mortgage loan secured by 35 department stores. The equity in the mortgage borrower and its owner was also pledged to secure a $260 million senior mezzanine loan and a $65 million junior mezzanine loan. The modification provided for the release and replenishment of replacement reserves and a guaranty of maintenance of the properties and payments for replacements.
  • Represented the special servicer in the modification and extension of a securitized $250 million A Note, secured by a mortgage on two resort hotels in Hawaii that also secure a $127 million B Note and a $63 million C Note. The modifications released funds from reserves held by lender and provided for a cash trap to build additional reserve funds and certain principal prepayments.
  • Represented the special servicer of a securitized $167 million senior mortgage loan secured by seven hotels in negotiating certain loan modifications with the borrowers and holders of three mezzanine loans totaling $130 million to address impending cash flow problems that would have resulted in mezzanine loan defaults. The modifications allowed the mortgage lender to apply substantial reserves to reduce the loan balance, provided the borrower with additional reserves to complete renovations at one of the properties, and laid the groundwork for additional one year extensions of the mortgage and mezzanine loans.
  • Represented the servicer in connection with a complex equity restructuring of the borrower under a $3.1 billion mezzanine debt package relating to a 60-plus commercial office property portfolio. The loan structure involved 6 levels of mezzanine debt and 12 individual mezzanine loans that were beneficially owned by over 35 participants in addition to a securitization trust. The restructuring involved over 50 legal entities, including entities formed in Canada, Hungary and Cyprus and required the amendment or restatement of virtually all of the governing loan documents.
  • Served as lead counsel for master servicer in connection with assumption of loans relating to New York office towers which in one instance totaled over $1.1 billion including a mortgage loan as well as six tranches of mezzanine debt held by multiple participants and in the second instance totaled over $565 million including a mortgage loan, three tranches of mezzanine debt and the addition of a preferred equity component.
  • Represented servicer of a loan secured by a multiple property portfolio of data centers in connection with a complex restructuring accomplished in three phases allowing for the implementation of an operating partnership in which interests were to be sold to an equity investor in preparation of an initial public offering. The restructuring involved the collapse of operating leases on multiple properties and the implementation of service agreements in connection with borrower’s provision of data services to its many tenants.
  • Represented servicer of $234 million securitized mortgage loan secured by a residential condominium building in New York in multiple modifications and forbearance agreements. The loan structure included a B participation interest as well as six tiers of mezzanine debt. The modifications included restructuring reserves and application of partial release paydowns and additional guaranty arrangements.
  • Represented the servicer of a $146 million mortgage loan in connection with consent to the sale of junior mortgage loan participants and a mezzanine loan to an affiliate of the mortgage loan borrower.  Conditions to the consent included reinstatement of the participation agreement and modification of the mezzanine lender rights, and a new guaranty and collateral assignment of the junior participant's interest to secure certain of its obligations to the senior participant.  This ensured compliance with rating agency requirements for the purchase of loan interests by borrower affiliates, and substantial protection of the senior securitized participation interest in the mortgage loan against the borrower affiliate becoming an obstacle to enforcement of the mortgage loan.
  • Represented the servicer of eleven mortgage loans securing $145 million in debt in connection with consents to the merger of two hotel REITS that resulted in the restructuring of the borrowers' ownership group.  Our work involved a review of merger, organizational and operational documents, the addition of new reserves, guarantors and environmental indemnitors, the review of new opinion letters and assistance with approval of the transactions by the rating agencies.

Newsletters & E-Alerts

June 17, 2009
This e-Alert is prepared as a source of general information concerning recent legal developments. If you would like more information, please contact a member of our Corporate, Tax or Real Estate Finance groups. For a printable version of this Client Advisory, click here.
February 2009
On November 10, 2008, DBSI Inc. (“DBSI”), as well as dozens of special purpose entities that were affiliates of DBSI (each, a “Master Tenant,” and collectively with DBSI, “Debtor”) filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (collectively, the “DBSI Bankruptcy”). DBSI was one of many tenant in common syndicators (“TIC Syndicators”) that generated its revenue through the creation of tenants in common real estate transactions, in which the TIC Syndicator would acquire an interest in a commercial real estate property and sell off fractional interests of the real estate to multiple (up to 35 per transaction) tenants in common (“TICs”).