Polsinelli has one of the largest creditors’ rights practices in the nation. Our lawyers are situated from coast to coast, from New York to Los Angeles, and have practiced for more than 28 years in state courts, federal courts, and bankruptcy courts in more than 40 states.  

Our lawyers practice law with an eye – always – toward the business objectives of our clients. We realize that lenders enforcing their rights with respect to special assets are looking to remain constantly informed, want to know their alternatives, and want to maximize return in the shortest period of time and in the most cost-efficient manner possible. Accordingly, we can tell you about differences in enforcement procedures from state to state, the amount of control a lender can expect to assert in connection with those procedures, and the expected timing and cost of such procedures. New York, Dallas, Chicago, and Los Angeles are different places, and they bring different experiences to enforcing lenders. We can tell you what to expect in each of those locations, and everywhere in between.

Maximization of recovery – and its flipside, minimization of loss severity – is not simply about foreclosures and suits on promissory notes and guaranties, although those remedies are very important to lenders. It is also about speed, for time of resolution is the single most important contributor to loss severity. It is also about preservation of assets during the period of time that it takes to enforce those ultimate remedies. We know this, and we have assisted lenders with moving quickly to protect their collateral – obtaining the appointments of receivers, obtaining restraining orders, obtaining orders of replevin, and obtaining other forms of extraordinary relief that are designed to preserve collateral, and sometimes even add value to it, pending disposition.

Our lawyers have also litigated in a number of cases where desperate borrowers have gone on the offensive – asserting lender liability claims against their lenders, and blaming their lenders for their financial woes. Breach of fiduciary duty, "control" claims, fraudulent transfer, wrongful loan administration, 365/360 class action interest claims – we have seen, and defeated, them all.

We are also well aware that lenders are often required to deal with parties other than wayward borrowers and their principals. We specialize in assisting lenders involved in participated, co-lending, and syndicated loan transactions. We have assisted lead lenders in defending claims brought by participants questioning lead lenders’ loan administration. Conversely, we have prosecuted claims on behalf of participants damaged by faulty loan administration by lead lenders. And we assist loan servicers on a day to day basis, who are subject to constant, conflicting demands from various lenders in a "debt stack" who may insist that their rights are superior to those of others.

Our creditors’ rights lawyers are also experienced in bankruptcy proceedings, particularly in Chapter 11, where borrowers sometimes turn for refuge. From "first day orders," which include a debtor’s temporary use of the lender’s cash collateral, to stay relief and plan confirmation proceedings – which mark the end of a case – the group’s lawyers have vast experience in the bankruptcy courts. We have litigated proceedings affecting lenders’ claims in bankruptcy (including claims for yield maintenance and prepayment consideration), have defended avoidance (preference and fraudulent transfer) actions against creditors, have prosecuted stay relief motions, have litigated to maintain state-court-appointed receivers in possession of collateral after borrowers file bankruptcy, have defeated debtors’ plans of reorganization, and have filed and had confirmed our own liquidating plans as alternatives to debtors’ plans that have not afforded fair value to secured lenders’ claims.

For lenders, we are everywhere and anywhere you need us to be.
  • Counsel to Loan Servicer sued in connection with servicing of $160 million loan secured by hotel, spa and casino in Las Vegas, Nevada. Case dismissed.
  • Defended Secured Lender and Loan Servicer in lender liability litigation brought in New York, New York, in which Borrower asserted that loan reserves were being improperly administered and that Lender was not properly disbursing reserve monies for payment of replacements and remediation at hotel property securing debt of $90 million.  Obtained dismissal of case with zero liability to Lender and Servicer.
  • Counsel to Secured Lender who obtained appointment of Receiver to administer two assisted living facilities in St. Louis, Missouri, securing debt of $30 million.  Maintained Receiver in possession of facilities through two separate Chapter 11 filings by Borrower, obtained dismissal of both Chapter 11 proceedings, and effected sale of facilities through receivership, rather than foreclosure, resulting in full payment to Secured Lender and zero loss.
  • Represented Lender in successful workout and full payoff of $20 million loan secured by industrial property in Houston, Texas, involving multiple and complex collateralizations.
  • Counsel to Secured Lender who obtained appointment of Receiver to administer two office buildings in Dallas, Texas, securing debt of $18.5 million.  Effected sale of buildings through receivership, rather than foreclosure, over objections of Mezzanine Lender and Borrower, resulting in full payment to Secured Lender and zero loss.
  • Represented Lender in successful workout and restructuring of $10 million loan secured by condominium development, including conversion of project to apartment development to fully capitalize on state and federal historic tax credits to “right-size” loan.
  • Defended Secured Lender and Loan Servicer in lender liability action brought in Dallas, Texas, in which Borrower asserted claim for damages for Lender’s and Servicer’s alleged wrongful refusal to reasonably approve proposed change in franchise of hotel securing debt of $7.9 million.  Obtained dismissal of case with zero liability to Lender and Servicer.
  • Represented Lender in registration and enforcement of $7 million loan, and substantial recovery of funds using forensic analysis of borrower’s financial transactions and carefully timed garnishment and execution proceedings
  • Defended Lender who received payment in full of $6 million loan via Borrower’s sale of business to Purchaser, who subsequently filed Chapter 11 in Topeka, Kansas.  Purchaser sued to avoid sale transaction as fraudulent transfer and to recover $6 million purchase price.  Obtained directed verdict in favor of Lender.
  • Represented Secured Lender in Chapter 11 proceeding in Los Angeles, California, where Lender was owed $4.5 million, secured by hotel in Manhattan Beach.  Filed competing creditor plan and opposed confirmation of Borrower’s proposed “cram down” plan.  Obtained confirmation of creditor’s plan and obtained order denying confirmation of plan of Borrower / Debtor.
  • Represented Secured Lender in six-count lender liability action brought in Akron, Ohio.  Obtained summary judgment on all six counts and obtained summary judgment on Lender’s claims on note, guaranty, and for foreclosure, resulting in foreclosure of office complex securing indebtedness of $3.85 million.
  • Defended Lender in suit, brought in Los Angeles, California, against Lender by Borrower for recovery of $2 million in prepayment consideration / yield maintenance that was paid to Lender, under protest, when Borrower prepaid loan.  Obtained summary judgment in favor of Lender.
  • Successfully defended Lenders in suit brought in St. Louis County, Missouri and in U.S. District Court seeking damages for document preparation fees charged by Lenders.  Obtained summary judgment in favor of Lenders, and successfully defended judgment before Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and United States Supreme Court.
  • Successfully defended Lenders in various class action and lender liability lawsuits asserting claims for “365/360” interest calculations in various courts in Illinois. 
  • Represented Lender in successful recovery of insurance proceeds on multiple policies covering lender liability claims.  Obtained recovery of approximately three times amount sought by Lender.


eAlerts Alerts
June 23, 2016
eAlerts Alerts
June 23,. 2016
Publications & Presentations
November 20, 2015
webinar Webinars
February 12, 2015
eAlerts Alerts
July 29, 2013
eAlerts Alerts
In 2012, two decisions were published regarding Missouri foreclosure law and how obligors' deficiencies should be measured following foreclosures. The decisions were somewhat surprising given that Missouri law has been long-settled regarding how to measure deficiencies following foreclosures, and given that the long-settled law seemed well-justified by Missouri's statutory scheme governing foreclosure sales.
March 14, 2013
Publications & Presentations
March 2013
eAlerts Alerts
The Creditors Rights, Loan Enforcement and Creditor Bankruptcy Representation practice group provides these e-communications periodically to keep you updated on recently adopted legislation, important iusses dealing with distressed assets and key changes in the law.
November 2012
Publications & Presentations
July 2012
Publications & Presentations
The Creditors Rights, Loan Enforcement and Creditor Bankruptcy Representation practice group provides these e-communications periodically to keep you updated on recently adopted legislation, important iusses dealing with distressed assets and key changes in the law.
March 2012
Recent News


Past Events