In a historic week for digital assets, the United States has officially enacted its first federal crypto legislation with the GENIUS Act signed into law on July 18, 2025. Passed after the longest House vote in history, this bipartisan milestone establishes a comprehensive framework for the issuance, sale and redemption of fiat-backed digital assets and bringing long-awaited regulatory clarity to stablecoins, and opening the door for their use in faster, cheaper and more secure payment systems. This update breaks down what the GENIUS Act means for businesses and financial institutions, tracks the parallel developments of the CLARITY Act in the House and Senate market structure efforts, and recaps other major legal and regulatory developments from what lawmakers dubbed “Crypto Week” on Capitol Hill. We paused our usual biweekly schedule so we could deliver the legislative updates while they were fresh, and in hindsight, that was the right call. There’s a lot to cover. Read on for analysis, updates and a few additional developments briefly noted below. GENIUS Act Passes House, Signed Into Law: July 17, 2025 Background: It took the longest vote in House history, nearly 10 hours just to clear the procedural threshold for a floor vote, but the GENIUS Act ultimately passed on a striking 307–122 bipartisan vote. This rare show of consensus in today’s deeply divided Congress is an important signal of national momentum behind digital asset legislation. The President signed it into law  the following day, making it the first federal crypto legislation ever enacted in the U.S. making America one of the first countries to develop a formal legal framework for issuance, sale and redemption of digital assets pegged to a sovereign currency. The law’s regulatory framework gives businesses and financial institutions long-sought-after legal certainty around stablecoin use in payments and financial infrastructure. Analysis: It wouldn’t be a Crypto Week without some last-minute drama. The GENIUS Act almost fell apart when a group of House Republicans demanded the addition of the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act language to the bill. That move would have forced the bill back to the Senate, where it likely would have died. Fortunately, cooler heads prevailed—and likely some pressure from President Trump, who publicly urged Republicans to get behind crypto legislation—and the GENIUS Act made it through cleanly. Now law, it marks a historic turning point in U.S. crypto legislation and provides opportunity for stablecoins to be integrated into faster, more secure and cost-effective payment systems. CLARITY Act Passes House, Heads to the Senate: July 17, 2025 Background: The House also passed the CLARITY Act, its long-anticipated digital asset market structure bill with broad bipartisan support on a vote of 294-134. All House Republicans voted in favor of the legislation or abstained and 78 Democrats joined them—an improvement over FIT21, the prior House market structure bill, which drew 71 Democratic votes before dying in the Senate. The CLARITY Act now heads to the Senate, where it will meet competing frameworks already in development by the Agriculture and Banking Committees. This sets up the next phase of negotiations over what a final market structure bill might look like. Analysis: As with the GENIUS Act, the CLARITY vote nearly went sideways, due to last minute efforts of the House Freedom Caucus to attach the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act language to the bill. That move would have undermined the wide bipartisan support it eventually obtained. Instead a deal was struck to attach the CBDC provision to a separate defense spending authorization package, allowing for broad bipartisan support for the passage CLARITY. It remains to be seen whether the Senate will advance the CLARITY Act itself or use it as a base for new legislation. Either way, the level of bipartisan backing in the House is a promising signal. With parallel efforts already underway in Senate committees, the prospect of comprehensive digital asset market structure legislation becoming law is more real than at any time before. Senate Moves Forward on Market Structure: July 9, 2025 Background: The Senate Banking Committee held a hearing of the full committee titled From Wall Street to Web3: Building Tomorrow’s Digital Asset Markets. Witnesses included Summer Mersinger from the Blockchain Association, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse, Chainalysis CEO Jonathan Levin and others. The Senate Agriculture Committee has also scheduled its own hearing this week. The Senate Banking Committee has since then released a discussion draft of legislation along with a formal request for industry input. Analysis: The hearing marked another step in the Senate’s increasingly engaged posture on crypto regulation. Last month, the Senate Banking Committee leadership released its Principles for Market Structure Legislation. The hearing felt productive, reflected growing consensus that digital assets can no longer be ignored or simply litigated out of existence. Even skeptical voices are now focused on how to regulate crypto; not whether to do so (though many still appear unsure how to get their handle on something they tried to ignore away for years). That said the Senate remains well behind the House, which has already passed the CLARITY Act. And unlike the GENIUS Act’s fairly clean path to enactment, market legislation is expected to undergo extended negotiations between the chambers. Lawmakers, like  Senator Warren and Congresswoman Waters  are expected to oppose most market structure efforts, which could complicate the path to bipartisan consensus. Time is also running out: Congress is fast approaching its pre-election recess, and the window to finalize legislation this year is narrowing. And with the current state of dysfunction in Washington, anything is possible—including, as recent reports suggest, Congress going into early recess over political drama and rising fears of a government shutdown later this fall. The mere fact that crypto legislation is receiving this level of sustained attention in Congress is remarkable—and a sign of how far the industry has come in just a few years. Important Amicus Filed in Right-to-Code Case: July 7, 2025 Background: Back in January, a plaintiff backed by Coin Center filed a lawsuit  seeking a declaratory judgment that developing and publishing non‑custodial digital asset software does not require a money-transmitter license (the case is Lewellen v. Bondi in the Northern District of Texas). The Department of Justice (DOJ) moved to dismiss arguing that the plaintiff failed to show a credible threat of enforcement, failed to state a plausible constitutional claim and was seeking an improper advisory opinion. Now, a coalition of prominent digital asset stakeholders have filed an amicus brief opposing the DOJ’s motion and urging the court to allow the case to proceed. The amici include the venture firm Paradigm, the DeFi Education Fund, the Digital Chamber, the Solana Foundation and others—forming  a who’s-whoof crypto litigation advocates. Analysis: The DOJ argues there’s no credible risk of prosecution, but that position is hard to square with its ongoing criminal cases against crypto software developers. As the amicus brief states, “[t]he developers are analogous to the manufacturers of USB drives and frying pans. Since they merely make the tools that other people use to make transfers, they are not involved in the transfers themselves.” Despite signals from the current administration that it is taking a more constructive approach to crypto, this case highlights the persistent legal uncertainty facing developers. If the DOJ prevails, open-source software creators across the crypto ecosystem could remain exposed to prosecution simply for publishing code. Whether or not this court grants relief, the issue is unlikely to go away without either a legislative fix or clear, binding precedent. This is a fight that still needs to be fought at won or software developers in this and other spaces will remain at risk of criminal prosecution for public Briefly Noted: Paradigm Crypto User Research: Paradigm is a leader in crypto market research, and its latest mapping of crypto users is no exception. One of the more striking findings: 59% of respondents said the crypto assets someone owns—or previously owned—can reveal a lot about them. This suggests a growing belief that wallet history signals personal values, risk appetite or even political alignment. As crypto use becomes more mainstream, these behavioral cues may shape how users are profiled, marketed to or even evaluated for platform access. Research like this is especially valuable as more traditional businesses begin to explore the space under a more welcoming regulatory regime. Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act Update: Also during Crypto Week, in line with expectations Representative Emmer’s Anti-CBDC bill passed the House on a largely partly-line 219-210 vote with only 2 Democrats voting in favor. While the bill is unlikely to gain traction in the Senate, it shows concerns over digital asset financial surveillance which are worth considering. DeFi Broker Rule Is Done: The IRS rule regarding digital asset “broker” reporting requirements issued just before the last administration ended is now officially dead, after being directed to be retracted by Congress. A quite but meaningful  win for the industry and another loss for the dwindling anti-crypto holdouts in Washington who not too long ago openly talked of building an anti-crypto army.   Important Message from Commissioner Hester Peirce on Tokenization: In response to various tokenized securities announcements, Commissioner Peirce has released a well-timed statement “Enchanting, but Not Magical: A Statement on the Tokenization of Securities.” Her key message: tokenized or not, securities need to follow securities laws. “While blockchain-based tokenization is new, the process of issuing an instrument representing a security is not. The same legal requirements apply to on- and off-chain versions of these instruments.” This message is what Polsinelli advocated for on behalf of the Digital Chamber in a recently submitted letter to the SEC which we covered in our last update and was submitted a week before Commissioner Peirce’s statement. DOJ v. Storm Trial Updates: A few pre-trial developments surfaced in the DOJ’s criminal case against Roman Storm (this is a good background on the case available here). Among them: the DOJ reportedly misrepresented a text from a reporter as coming from another Tornado Cash developer during the Grand Jury proceedings, and there were some other spicy pre-trial exchanges. The trial is underway and expected to last for a few more weeks, so we will keep covering those developments as they occur. Banking Regulators Give Guidance on Crypto Custody: The FDIC, the Office of Comptroller of Currency and the Federal Reserve issued joint guidance stating that banks can custody crypto assets for customers but need to be aware of risks and take appropriate steps to manage risk.  A long overdue and welcomed step toward normalizing digital asset custody in the traditional banking system Crypto Tax Changes: Though announced a while ago, it made the news again that the President supports  a de minimis tax exemption on appreciation related to crypto used to purchase everyday goods and services. Any such changes are likely need to come from Congress as it considers appropriate ways to tax crypto. Crypto-specific tax change proposals were not included in the recently passed “big beautiful bill” despite a last minute push. John Doe Summons Live On: SCOTUS will not be hearing a case challenging the broad use of warrantless summons, called “John Doe” summons, against third parties including digital asset exchanges. Combined with the anti-CBDC legislative efforts and the prosecution of Roman Storm discussed above, the financial surveillance of digital assets and legality of privacy preserving technologies will continue to be hot topics to follow. Conclusion: The passage of the GENIUS Act marks a turning point in U.S. digital asset regulation, signaling that stablecoins are no longer operating in a legal gray space but within a defined and enforceable framework. Combined with bipartisan momentum behind the CLARITY Act and ongoing Senate efforts on broader market structure legislation, the U.S. is finally laying the groundwork for a cohesive digital asset regulatory regime. While challenges remain, including constitutional litigation over software development to unresolved questions around CBDCs and financial surveillance, the last few weeks which included “Crypto Week” have demonstrated that meaningful, bipartisan progress is not only possible but actively underway. If you have any questions about how the above developments affect your blockchain plans or any other questions regarding the legalities around various aspects of this rapidly developing industry, contact any member of the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team to set up a time to talk and see how we can be of assistance. Also, please subscribe to the BitBlog for alerts when new stories or updates are posted by our attorneys.

It’s been an eventful stretch in crypto law and regulation. The Senate passed the GENIUS Act — the first major federal crypto bill to clear the chamber’s 60-vote threshold needed to overcome a filibuster — which would establish clear federal guidelines for stablecoin issuance, governance, and custody. Legislative activity continues to accelerate in Congress, with the Senate also holding its first hearing focused squarely on crypto market structure. Meanwhile, the long-running SEC v. Ripple case appears to finally be drawing to a close — albeit without the court’s blessing on the parties’ proposed settlement. The Blockchain+ team at Polsinelli is also proud to have served as lead authors of a submission to the SEC’s Crypto Task Force on behalf of The Digital Chamber. The letter addresses the status of consumer NFTs and other digital assets that should not fall under the SEC’s purview, discusses how the SEC should develop a digital assets taxonomy, and makes certain suggestions regarding SEC processes on a going-forward basis. You can read the full letter here. These developments and a few other brief notes are discussed below. SEC v. Ripple Settlement Agreement Nixed by Trial Court; Appeals Still Dropped: June 26, 2025 Background: Back in May, Judge Torres denied the parties’ joint request to approve a final proposed settlement of the SEC v. Ripple matter. The parties went back to do the legwork that Judge Torres found lacking in their initial attempt, and Judge Torres has once again denied request, ruling that “the parties do not have the authority to agree not to be bound by a court’s final judgment that a party violated an Act of Congress in such a manner that a permanent injunction and a civil penalty were necessary to prevent that party from violating the law again.” Analysis: On one hand, it’s always troubling when a court gets between two parties trying to settle a matter. On the other hand, it is hard to fault Judge Torres, who watched the SEC spend immense administrative and judicial resources over a half-decade period only for the SEC to do a complete about-face after the matter concluded. As Judge Torres ruled, the SEC briefed that “without an injunction, Ripple would continue to disregard the laws of Congress in a manner that would hurt investors,” so hard to accept the SEC effectively asking the court to ‘disregard’ its own prior statements. Ripple announced it was dropping its appeal, so this appears to be the end of the matter. Senate Digital Asset Subcommittee Holds Market Structure Hearing: June 24, 2025 Background: The Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets held a hearing titled Exploring Bipartisan Legislative Frameworks for Digital Asset Market Structure. The same day, Senate Banking Committee Chair, along with 3 other Republican colleagues, released their proposed digital asset market structure legislation principles, which appear to align with the CLARITY Act currently pending in the House. The hearing was sparsely attended, with only five of the eleven subcommittee members making an appearance and Senator Alsobrooks (sitting in for Ranking Member Gallego) being the sole Democrat to attend. Analysis: Having already passed stablecoin legislation, the Senate is turning its eye to market structure legislation. However, the sparse attendance could indicate that priorities lie elsewhere while the Senate waits to see how the House handles the CLARITY Act and GENIUS Act. That said, this was the first Senate hearing on market structure that seemed less exploratory and more focused on actual legislative text goals — a positive step. It looks like the goal is for market structure to be through both chambers of Congress by the end of September, which is ambitious to say the least, but an aggressive timeline gives market structure a chance of passing this year. Stablecoin Bill Passes in Senate on 68-30 Bipartisan Vote: June 17, 2025 Background: As expected after clearing cloture, the GENIUS Act (as amended) has passed the Senate and now moves on to the House for its consideration. The bill requires most stablecoin issuers to be approved and overseen by federal financial regulators such as the FDIC, OCC, and Federal Reserve, while allowing states to approve issuance under $10 billion, as long as the entities are regulated at the state level under similar frameworks. The bill was amended to win over pro-crypto Democrats seeking stricter rules for nonfinancial and foreign stablecoin issuers. The scope of payment stablecoins is limited to centralized tokens, meaning they are issued and managed by a single entity that maintains full control over the reserves, with real world 1:1 backing, such as stablecoins backed by treasury instruments or the U.S. dollar. This is the first crypto bill to pass the Senate’s 60-vote majority needed to overcome Senate filibuster rules, unlike the Senate’s 2024 disapproval resolution for the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin, which only required a simple majority under the Congressional Review Act and was ultimately vetoed by President Biden. Analysis: There are currently enough votes in the House to get this passed and onto the President’s desk, where he has said he would sign the bill into law in its current form.  However, there are ongoing talks in the House to try to link the GENIUS Act’s passage with the CLARITY Act market structure legislation, which will face a much steeper path to passage. Hopefully, the GENIUS Act doesn’t get tripped up right before the finish line by efforts to tie it to broader legislation efforts. Effective market structure legislation could be truly transformative for the industry,  but there is a “bird in hand” argument for locking in a stablecoin win now instead of trying to do everything at once and ending nothing. Even if the GENIUS Act is signed into law, products such as Euro-pegged stablecoins, algorithmic stablecoins, and yield-bearing stablecoins have yet to be addressed. Briefly Noted: Payments Article: “How Stablecoins Could Transform Merchant Payments” by the Coinbase-led Payments Innovation Council is a great reference on how stablecoin payments can be implemented by businesses. The full protocol described in the article outlines a model compliant with existing payment processing laws (including smart-contract-enabled escrow for chargebacks) while potentially saving companies significant fees. DAO Governance Study: Practitioners in the space should read this recent study on governance centralization in decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs) and its drivers and economic implications. “Our findings suggest that DAOs thus far fall short of delivering the promise of decentralized governance.” Fed Reputational Risk Examinations Over: The Federal Reserve has joined the OCC and FDIC in ending “reputational risk” examinations for banks it oversees. This is part of a wider effort across agencies and Congress to require firm metrics for banking examinations rather than basing examinations on industries a bank services. Bitcoin Backed Mortgages: Federal Housing Finance Agency’s Director, Bill Pulte, has directed the agency to study consumers’ use of crypto holdings for mortgage qualifications and a letter directing Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac to consider crypto for mortgage loan risk assessments. Prediction Markets/Funding Stays Hot: Kalshi, one of the leading prediction markets permitted in the U.S. after winning their dispute with the CFTC last year, is reportedly raising $185 million in a Series C at a $2 billion valuation. Polymarket also reportedly closed on a $200 million raise at a $1 billion valuation. The M&A activity is also starting to provide venture funds with liquidity for new investments. In-Kind Redemptions Coming: ETF purchasers are going to be given the option for in-kind redemptions in the near future. So people can buy in or sell ETF positions without exiting the underlying asset. There are still tax compliance issues to work through before this becomes a reality, though. FTX Creditor Distributions Begin: FTX’s bankruptcy estate started its first wave of creditor distributions on June 24, 2025, with some customers reportedly seeing higher-than-expected recoveries thanks to crypto market gains. Additional payouts are expected to continue into 2026. Supreme Court to Hear ’40 Act Matter: The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear a case that would settle a split between the Circuits as to whether there is a private right of action under the Investment Company Act of 1940, or the ’40 Act.  Courts had long held that there is no such right of action until SDNY, and then the 2nd Circuit found that the ’40 Act contains "rights-creating language" that a court can't deny a rescission claim for violation of the statute.  While this doesn’t directly implicate crypto, many crypto and DAO structures potentially implicate the registration provisions of the Investment Company Act.  If there is a private right of action, there may be another fairly broad avenue for class action plaintiffs to bring new claims.  Conclusion: From stalled settlements in federal court to ambitious timelines for market structure legislation, digital asset law in the United States remains in flux. While the GENIUS Act’s bipartisan support offers a rare moment of legislative clarity, efforts to tie it to broader market reforms could still jeopardize its path forward. At the same time, regulatory agencies continue to refine how they treat crypto-related activities, from stablecoin payments to mortgage underwriting. As always, the space moves fast, and legal practitioners will need to keep pace with a landscape that is being rewritten in real time. If you have any questions about how the above developments affect your blockchain plans or any other questions regarding the legalities around various aspects of this rapidly developing industry, contact any member of the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team to set up a time to talk and see how we can be of assistance. Also, please subscribe to the BitBlog for alerts when new stories or updates are posted by our attorneys.

The Polsinelli Blockchain+ team attended Consensus last week in Toronto, where a key takeaway was the increasing engagement by major traditional financial players with the blockchain industry, both through integrating the technology into their products and services and through broader involvement with the ecosystem. Much of this activity seems tied to the growing perception that meaningful legislative and administrative progress is on the horizon, which would offer the regulatory clarity these institutions have been waiting for. Congress has been active over the past few weeks, with much of the focus on the Senate stablecoin bill, which recently cleared the cloture hurdle—a critical procedural step and arguably the closest Congress has come to enacting meaningful crypto legislation. The House also saw developments, including the release of a market structure proposal and the last-minute cancellation of a planned joint committee hearing due to concerns raised by some representatives about the President’s business ties to the digital asset space. In parallel, several administrative agencies issued updates on federally regulated banks’ permitted involvement in digital assets, and there were notable developments in ongoing litigation. These developments and a few other brief notes are discussed below. Senate “GENIUS” Stablecoin Bill Passes Cloture: May 19, 2025 Background: After weeks of political jockeying, the GENIUS Act received more than the 60 votes needed for cloture (with 16 Democrats voting in favor) and now proceeds to limited floor debate in the Senate. The Senate Banking Committee released a fact sheet outlining what the bill does and does not do with respect to stablecoin issuance and use in the United States. Senate Democrats also circulated their own summary highlighting what they saw as wins from negotiations between the bill’s committee passage and the recent vote. Analysis: Senator Warner (D-VA) issued a statement supporting the bill, saying: “Many senators, myself included, have very real concerns about the Trump family’s use of crypto technologies… But we cannot allow that corruption to blind us to the broader reality: blockchain technology is here to stay. If American lawmakers don’t shape it, others will – and not in ways that serve our interests or democratic values.” It is refreshing to see a senior member of Congress prioritize the importance of this technology and the need for the U.S. to take a leadership role, even while holding legitimate concerns about other aspects of the industry. As such, this bill marks a major milestone for digital asset regulation in America. Several amendments were added during the negotiation process. Notably, the bill prohibits stablecoin issuers from paying interest directly to holders, and from most public companies that are not otherwise in the banking business from issuing stablecoins without clearing certain additional requirements. Joint House Agriculture and Financial Services Committee Roundtable for Market Structure: May 6, 2025 Background: The day after the Market Structure 2.0 draft was released (discussed below), a joint House Agriculture and Financial Services Committee meeting was scheduled to occur. Witnesses included industry representatives and former CFTC Chair Rostin Behnam. However, the proceeding did not become an official “hearing” because unanimous consent was required, and Ranking Member Maxine Waters objected. Instead, it continued as a “roundtable” discussion with the witnesses who had traveled to D.C. to testify. Meanwhile, those opposing the hearing held their own separate “roundtable” down the hall, focused largely on concerns regarding President Trump’s family’s involvement in digital assets. Analysis: While it was disappointing that a full and balanced committee meeting did not take place, we can find some encouraging data in that members chose to walk out. One way to interpret the walkout is that opposition to crypto legislation is shifting from a partisan divide to a generational one. The average age of those who boycotted the hearing was 70.4, highlighting a potential age gap in attitudes toward the technology. Many of the opponents are at least framing their objections not as concerns about the technology itself, but as a way of expressing their discomfort with the President’s family’s involvement in space. It remains to be seen whether these concerns will stall broader legislation that would provide consumer protection regulation to the industry as a whole, including the President’s affiliated businesses, given that this same controversy already slowed, though did not appear to stop, the passage of the comparatively less controversial stablecoin bill discussed above. Market Structure 2.0 Initial Draft Released: May 5, 2025 Background: The currently unnamed bill that replaces FIT21 as the next attempt at comprehensive market structure regulation for digital assets was released last week. It largely follows the same format as FIT21 but includes important changes that are generally seen as improvements by the digital asset community. One major revision replaces the term “decentralized systems” with “mature blockchain systems,” shifting the threshold for when a blockchain is considered decentralized to whether it is—or could be—controlled by a single entity or affiliated group. Another key change creates a baseline that digital assets are commodities, but then reiterates that they are only commodities if they are not securities (which was already the case under current law). The draft also clarifies that digital assets themselves are not securities, but rather can be sold in securities transactions. Analysis: Gabe Shapiro, a thoughtful legal commentator and frequent critic of regulatory overreach in crypto, posted a detailed breakdown of the bill that is worth reviewing. Justin Slaughter, a former SEC and Hill staffer who often highlights the political dynamics behind crypto legislation, also shared a thread noting, among other things, that Japan passed a market structure bill before the FTX collapse—likely one reason why FTX Japan was among the few subsidiaries where customers didn’t lose funds. Given that the U.S. divides financial regulatory authority between the CFTC and SEC, it’s likely that any legislation will continue to reflect that split, which could lead to substantial compliance and legal costs for market participants, especially exchanges. Still, this draft appears well-intentioned and is a meaningful improvement over FIT21. Briefly Noted: DOJ Disclosure Issues in Samourai: According to recent filings in the criminal case against the Samourai Wallet privacy-preserving software creators, the DOJ failed to disclose evidence that  FinCEN representatives told DOJ staff that “under FinCEN’s guidance, the Samourai Wallet app would not qualify as a ‘Money Services Business’ requiring a FinCEN license.” Stocks On Chain: There were several updates related to on-chain stock trading. Commissioner Peirce gave a speech about allowing stocks to be issued, traded and settled on blockchains, and Compound founder’s project Superstate announced plans for bringing stocks on-chain and tradable in DeFi. Tuongvy Le and Austin Campbell released this awesome article (and Twitter threads giving summaries along with useful infographics) on how cryptographically secured addendum-only ledger technology can offer a fundamentally better way to own and trade stocks. Good timing with the SEC roundtable on this issue, the same week as well, with the new SEC Chair delivering opening remarks. SEC FAQ Guidance: The SEC released a set of frequently asked questions (“FAQs”) relating to the application of certain broker-dealer rules to crypto activities. While the SEC said these “simply reiterate what our rules already say or do not say,” many broker-dealers were waiting for this type of guidance to go through with various crypto brokering activities. SEC v. Ripple Deal Rejected: Judge Torres denied the parties’ joint request to rule in favor of a proposed settlement, which would finally end the SEC v. Ripple matter. It appears that the judge is just looking for the parties to do more of the required legwork to obtain the relief requested, but the ongoing delays are unlikely to please either side. Bill to Ban Federal Officials in Crypto: Various Democrats have proposed a bill that would ban the creation and promotion of cryptocurrencies by the President, Vice President, Congress, and Senate-confirmed Cabinet members.   Yuga Sells Punks IP: It appears like the Infinite Node Foundation (NODE) has acquired the CryptoPunks IP, which was purchased by Yuga Labs a few years ago from the creators, Matt Hall and John Watkinson (who are the highest selling living artists due to $3.07B in CryptoPunk sales volume). Handing off this historic intellectual property to a full-time, non-profit steward makes sense. CFTC Commissioner to Lead Blockchain Association: Commissioner Mersinger of the CFTC will be taking the role of Blockchain Association CEO after she steps down from her role at the CFTC at the end of this month. There were still three years left on her term, so her leaving to join one of the leading industry groups in the space is interesting timing, with market structure bills expected to get heavy congressional attention in the upcoming months. Office of Comptroller Update: OCC-regulated banks are now permitted to provide custody services for customers as well as other services, such as record keeping and buying/selling those assets at the direction of the customer. This is long overdue. Combined with promising statements for the Treasury Secretary,  we are starting to see a path for traditional financial institutions to interface with DeFi on behalf of clients. Quoted in GlobeSt.com “Blockchain in Real Estate Moves Beyond Hype, But True Transformation Remains Elusive”: BitBlog editor Stephen Rutenberg was recently quoted in GlobeSt.com on the evolving use of blockchain in real estate. The article explores how the technology is gradually addressing longstanding inefficiencies while raising deeper questions about automation, fairness, and legal design. Conclusion: The last two weeks have offered a compelling snapshot of how digital asset regulation is evolving from theoretical frameworks to real-world implementation, with significant activity across all three branches of government. From the Senate’s forward momentum on the GENIUS stablecoin bill, to the House’s increasingly detailed market structure proposals, to administrative updates from the SEC, DOJ, OCC, and others, the regulatory landscape is rapidly taking shape. Meanwhile, traditional financial institutions are moving beyond the exploratory phase and actively engaging with blockchain technologies, underscoring the urgency for regulatory clarity. While political entanglements, especially those involving high-profile figures, continue to create friction, the overall trend suggests a maturing ecosystem where bipartisan and intergenerational engagement will be essential. The coming months are likely to be pivotal, and the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team will continue to monitor and analyze developments to help clients navigate this dynamic legal and regulatory environment. If you have any questions about how the above developments affect your blockchain plans or any other questions regarding the legalities around various aspects of this rapidly developing industry, contact any member of the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team to set up a time to talk and see how we can be of assistance. Also, please subscribe to the BitBlog for alerts when new stories or updates are posted by our attorneys.

After a relatively quiet October for Web3 legal developments, November has kicked off with significant activity, primarily centered around ongoing lawsuits and regulatory enforcement actions. In addition to these legal developments, the recent election results indicate a shift in the U.S. administration, with incoming leadership signaling a strong focus on crypto and digital assets. Coupled with a new Congress that appears to be more pro-crypto than its predecessor, we can expect rapid developments in Web3 law through the end of 2024 and into 2025. That said, the new administration may also pose unintended challenges for the industry. Increased focus on national security concerns could lead to restrictions on certain projects or activities in the U.S., along with potential disruptions in trade and strained alliances, all of which will require careful navigation. The potential implications of this shift are significant. While many uncertainties remain, there are growing reasons for both optimism and caution. This could be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to shape legal frameworks and protections for digital assets. From updates to the IRS tax code to potential changes in securities laws, the regulatory landscape could evolve to better reflect the reality of digital assets. As we move forward, it’s essential for legal professionals and industry experts to remain informed and engaged. By advocating for thoughtful regulation, the U.S. can maintain its leadership in fostering a safe, secure, and innovative environment for digital assets. These developments and a few other brief notes are discussed below. SEC Seeks to Dismiss Declaratory Judgment Action by NFT Creators: October 28, 2024 Background: The SEC has filed a Motion to Dismiss in a declaratory judgment action brought by various NFT creators seeking clarity that the digital artworks they sold were not unregistered securities transactions under federal securities laws. The SEC’s motion, made under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1), argues that the agency is protected by sovereign immunity from having its enforcement discretion challenged and that the claims are not ripe because the SEC has not yet brought charges against the particular plaintiffs who are bringing the action against the SEC. Analysis: As stated by one Plaintiff: “Respectfully, I’m asking the SEC to explain why I can’t do exactly what Stoner Cats did,” referring to the action by the agency against the creators of the online comic series Stoner Cats, which was fined $1 million by the SEC and ordered to destroy all remaining digital art in the creator’s possession. It seems like the agency has been backed in the corner, on one hand stating that the action is not ripe, while at the same time arguing that the rules for digital assets based on 1940’s “investment contract” case law are clear despite multiple courts disagreeing with the agency on that point. Amicus Support Action for Token Airdrop Clarity: October 28, 2024 Background: Coinbase, a16z/Paradigm, and Coin Center have filed amicus briefs in support of an action brought by a Texas apparel company seeking a declaratory judgment that its potential token airdrop to merchandise purchasers does not violate federal securities laws. The SEC had previously moved to dismiss on procedural grounds stating that the SEC is immune from being required to answer the action and that the action’s claims under the Administrative Procedure Act are not ripe. Analysis: The a16z/Paradigm brief says it well at pg. 16, stating, “Given the similarity between the allegations against [Justin Sun] and other companies and the facts presented by Beba, it is unsurprising that the SEC has offered no explanation why the threat of enforcement is not credible.” In reality, it seems that the main thing that has prevented the SEC from bringing lawsuits against virtually all digital asset participants to date is seemingly a lack of resources. The amicus all strike a similar tone—after years of attempting to get guidance from the SEC and Congress on how to operate legally compliant digital asset companies, the only recourse left is either the courts or abandoning the U.S. entirely. Oral Arguments on SEC v. Heart Motion to Dismiss Occur: October 31, 2024 Background: On Halloween, there were oral arguments heard in the SEC v. Heart case on the Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. The SEC has alleged that Hex founder Richard Heart and three unincorporated entities that he allegedly controls conducted unregistered offerings of crypto assets that allegedly raised more than $1 billion from investors. The dismissal arguments mostly centered around the extra-territorial approach the SEC has applied to the case, but also included discussions of the allegations of fraud and the propriety (or lack thereof) of naming software as named entities in a lawsuit. Analysis: The Blockchain+ team has been following this case, and we were quoted in a Bloomberg law article about it earlier this spring, so it feels appropriate to continue to follow as the case raises important issues applicable for many companies seeking to avoid U.S. jurisdictional laws regarding digital assets. It appears that the SEC has abandoned the argument that it can name software as a defendant in a lawsuit. It also appears the SEC may be claiming that the actions that allegedly give rise to jurisdictional claims (fall of 2022) occurred after the alleged securities offering occurred (spring of 2022). It remains unclear if or how one can retroactively make an offering a “U.S. offering” based on actions that occurred after the alleged sales. Blockchain Gaming Developer Receives SEC Wells Notice: November 1, 2024 Background: Blockchain-based gaming infrastructure developer Immutable Pty Ltd. has reportedly received a Wells notice from the SEC informing the company of anticipated agency action related to certain sales of IMX tokens in 2021. According to the SEC Enforcement Manual, a Wells notice is generally only issued after SEC staff have completed their investigation but before making a formal recommendation to the Commission. Here, Immutable claims the Wells notice was issued mere hours after first being contacted by the SEC informing the company of the investigation. Analysis: The IMX token is listed on Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase, so it is surprising the SEC is targeting Immutable instead of the plethora of token issuers of the tokens named in the SEC’s lawsuits against those exchanges. It is possible the SEC is seeking to have active litigation against a wide range of actors (such as the recent market maker targeted actions) from exchanges to issuers to developers—so this is the “gaming” developer the agency has its eyes set on. FOIA Requests Reveal Banks Blocked from Accepting Digital Asset Customers: November 2, 2024 Background: Coinbase has revealed that it has unearthed at least 20 documents from its successful FOIA requests to the FDIC where the agency tells banks to “pause” or “refrain from providing” or “not proceed” with offering crypto-banking services. This is an ongoing request, and Coinbase recently served additional requests on the FDIC so more documents can be expected. The Coinbase head of legal stated: “We’ll keep pushing to get clarity from our regulators through FOIA requests and any other means necessary.” Analysis: The “shadow cap” of not allowing banks to have more than a certain percent of their customer deposits be from digital asset companies is something that was suspected to be a part of Chokepoint 2.0 and which a Silvergate executive Declaration seemed to support. It will be interesting if further documents are made public or if anything will come of these efforts, as it is expected the incoming administration will replace current banking regulatory heads with individuals who are more open to digital asset companies obtaining traditional U.S. banking services. Binance Entities Move to Dismiss SEC’s Amended Complaint: November 4, 2024 Background: Back in September, the SEC filed an Amended Complaint against Binance, and the redline revealed the primary changes were adding facts to try to avoid there being a ruling as a matter of law on certain third party token sales (also, an added footnote about how the SEC didn’t mean “crypto asset security” when the SEC said, “crypto asset security.”). Binance U.S. has now moved to dismiss the over 800-paragraph Amended Complaint. Binance’s foreign entity also moved to dismiss, available here. Binance U.S.’s main argument is that the SEC cannot articulate any distinguishing factors as to why the tokens the agency named were sold in securities transactions, while Ether and Bitcoin were not, stating “the legal requirements of Howey do not shift based on the SEC’s enforcement whims.” Binance U.S. is also focusing on the lack of pooling and classifying the SEC’s allegations as an “investment of money and a common enterprise” instead of the required “investment of money in a common enterprise.” Analysis: The Motion to Dismiss filed by Binance U.S. included 19 exhibits, which is unusual, as such motions typically cannot rely on external evidence or facts. However, the SEC’s heightened fact pleading also means the agency incorporated documents by reference into the Amended Complaint, which the Court can consider in reaching its determination. Binance U.S.’s exhibits primarily point to listing pages for Bitcoin and Ether, stating if those listing pages do not convert BTC/ETH into securities, then listing pages from other assets with identical information cannot support security law violation allegations. Binance U.S. also (probably smartly) stayed away from the “investment contracts require contracts” arguments, which it previously lost on, instead leaning into the lack of pooling in a common enterprise. Briefly Noted: Regulation by Enforcement Tracker Launched: The Blockchain Association has launched a great website showing data behind the SEC’s “regulation by enforcement” approach against America’s leading crypto companies. This and the awesome effort spearheaded by Polygon Labs to start preparing a list of real world positive use cases are great resources. SEC Commissioner Rebukes Approach to Crypto (Again): Commissioner Peirce recently gave a speech titled Hobs and Hobbes: Wharton FinTech Lecture where she reiterated her negative view on how the SEC has approached digital asset regulation. “Rather than working with crypto market intermediaries and token issuers to facilitate registration, we have brought enforcement actions for failure to do the impossible: register with a Commission that has failed willfully to articulate a viable path to registration.” SEC Moves to Dismiss Some Kraken Defenses: The SEC has moved for judgment on the pleadings on Kraken’s Major Question, Lack of Fair Notice, and Due Process affirmative defenses, claiming these were decided on Motion to Dismiss as being inapplicable. The Court is unlikely to dismiss any of these affirmative defenses, which would cut off discovery into these issues by Kraken and be an appealable issue the Court has no reason to create, but it is something worth monitoring. Fairshake PAC Performance: According to Stand with Crypto, a bipartisan group of 257 candidates rated “pro crypto” won their House elections along with 16 in the Senate (as opposed to “anti-crypto” rated candidates, which only won 115 and 12 seats in the House and Senate, respectively). The biggest wins were Yadira Caraveo (D-CO), Sarah McBride (D-DE), and Bernie Moreno (R-OH) winning over their anti-crypto opponents in part on the backs of crypto-PAC spending in their favor. Also Richie Torres (D-NY), who was expected to win but has been a staunch advocate for sensible digital asset laws and will continue to be a force in the House. Combined with some massive wins in the primaries, the industry’s lobbying efforts are something that politicians will certainly factor into ongoing policy decisions. FTX Sues Various Platform Users: FTX filed ~25 lawsuits recently seeking to claw back funds from various individuals that received funds from FTX, including Anthony Scaramucci, the alleged Compound governance attacker, Deltec Bank, Binance founder CZ, and others. That said, this is seemingly an aggressive approach to clawbacks and such, which may or may not have merit, so whether these lawsuits go anyway is yet to be seen. Hong Kong Moving Forward in Crypto: The Hong Kong Stock Exchange is introducing bitcoin and ether index prices in November and looking into tax issues and trading platform licensing. Conclusion: November marks an inflection point in the ongoing regulatory and legal battles shaping the future of digital assets in the U.S. and beyond. With a pro-crypto Congress set to take office, pressure is mounting on regulatory bodies to provide clearer guidelines, yet agencies like the SEC remain steadfast in their enforcement-first approach. As illustrated by Binance's legal defenses and the increasing amicus support from industry advocates, the crypto sector is actively pushing back on the lack of clear regulatory frameworks, fighting for operational clarity and fair treatment under the law. At the same time, global developments, like Hong Kong's proactive stance, highlight the competitive pressures facing U.S. regulators and lawmakers. The combination of ongoing legal battles, shifting political priorities, and the potential for new policies presents both opportunities and challenges for the industry. The only thing certain is that we are in for an interesting ride. If you have any questions about how the above developments affect your blockchain plans or any other questions regarding the legalities around various aspects of this rapidly developing industry, contact any member of the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team to set up a time to talk and see how we can be of assistance. Also, please subscribe to the BitBlog for alerts when new stories or updates are posted by our attorneys.

The last two weeks have seen a flurry of Congressional hearings addressing key digital asset issues, alongside several noteworthy consent judgments against industry participants from the SEC. These fast-paced developments are expected to continue through the end of September, when both the CFTC and SEC conclude their fiscal years, as they strive to optimize their results for 2024. While there almost certainly won’t be crypto legislation passed this year, Congress looks to set the stage for potential digital asset legislation in the upcoming lame duck session after the November elections and beyond. These developments and a few other brief notes are discussed below. Congress Holds Hearing on Decentralized Finance (“DeFi”): September 10, 2024 Background: The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion held a hearing entitled Decoding DeFi: Breaking Down the Future of Decentralized Finance. It featured testimony from Rebecca Rettig (Chief Legal and Policy Officer at Polygon Labs), Peter Van Valkenburgh (Coin Center’s Director of Research), and others. The Committee Memorandum is available here. The Digital Chamber provided a nice summary of the hearing, available here. Analysis: The fact that DeFi has even reached the level of importance to warrant a Congressional hearing is a big step for this burgeoning subset of the digital asset industry. This does not mean that the hearing was totally supportive of DeFi, with Representative Sherman and others using the hearing as a platform to make unsubstantiated claims that DeFi’s primary use is for tax evasion. These assertions were effectively countered by Van Valkenburgh stating that “Tax evasion is a crime. It should be aggressively policed…I do not, however, think that tax evasion and its existence warrant a 100% surveilled and controlled financial system.” The fact that subsets of digital assets remain a partisan issue is somewhat disheartening, but not entirely unexpected. eToro Settles with SEC and Delists Virtually All Crypto Assets: September 12, 2024 Background: Trading platform eToro USA LLC has agreed to pay $1.5 million to settle charges that it operated an unregistered broker and unregistered clearing agency in connection with its trading platform that facilitated buying and selling certain crypto assets as “securities.” While the platform will continue to permit trading of BTC, ETH, and BCH (Bitcoin Cash), all other digital assets such as LTC (Litecoin), DOGE, and others will be removed. The Order curiously mandates that eToro immediately stop selling those assets while simultaneously requiring the company to sell those assets or otherwise refund customers within 180 days. Analysis: It is unclear why BCH will be permitted to continue being traded on the platform despite not being meaningfully different from Litecoin. Could it have something to do with BCH having “Bitcoin” in its name? The requirements of the settlement do not appear to give eToro a feasible path forward to operate its U.S. business. This is disappointing considering that prior to the settlement, eToro seemingly tried to follow SEC guidance in that it de-listed assets that the SEC named in other lawsuits as securities, obtained a BitLicense and other state regulatory licenses, and otherwise acted cautiously in an attempt to remain in compliance. It looks like the only way for eToro to comply with the forced sell aspect of Order will be to sell overseas (likely at deep discounts), which will then be passed on to customers. As mentioned above, we expect more of these settlements/actions to flow in leading up to SEC’s September 30 fiscal year end.  Flyfish Club Settles with SEC over NFT Restaurant Membership Sales: September 16, 2024 Background: The SEC issued an Order against Flyfish Club, the creators of restaurant club passes in the form of NFTs. Flyfish Club NFTs represented membership in the private dining club, for which holders of the NFT could digitally verify such membership and make reservations at the restaurant, but the Staff took the position that the NFTs were marketed as securities because they could be resold for a profit. As usual, Commissioners Peirce and Uyeda dissented. As a part of the agreement, Flyfish Club agreed to destroy any NFTs in the company’s possession that it hasn’t sold, not take royalties on any ongoing secondary sales, and pay a $750,000 fine, among other things. This order was issued only a few days before the opening of the restaurant and did not prevent its opening or help the token holders obtain their membership benefits. Analysis: The fact pattern in FlyClub closely resembles that of Silver Hills Country Club v. Sobieski, a California state court case from 1960. That court found that the country club memberships at issue were being sold as securities and did so through the creation of the “risk capital” test. That test almost exclusively looks at whether a seller is seeking risk capital to develop a business venture. The fact that the memberships were transferable led that court to determine that they represented “risk capital.” In the FlyClub order, while the SEC tries to connect the violations to the Howey test, this could be seen as a move towards the SEC adopting the risk capital test. It’s important to note that the risk capital test has never been recognized by any federal court in the United States. It is also interesting that the SEC has now entered two settlements with two consumptive NFTs and did not require the project to cease and desist, nor did it require a repurchase offer. This contrasts with most SEC settlements with and lawsuits against issuers of utility tokens, in which the SEC demanded that the project shut down. At least the people who want to eat can be fed. House Financial Services Committee Holds Hearing on SEC Approach to Digital Assets: September 18, 2024 Background: Following up on the DeFi hearing the week before, the House Financial Services Subcommittee on Digital Assets, Financial Technology and Inclusion held a hearing entitled Dazed and Confused: Breaking Down the SEC’s Politicized Approach to Digital Assets. It featured testimony from Dan Gallagher (former SEC Commissioner), Michael Liftik (former Deputy Chief of Staff to SEC Chair White), and others. The Committee Memorandum started with the following Introduction: “The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has long struggled with the application of the United States’ securities laws to the digital asset ecosystem. Under Chair Gensler, the SEC has prioritized and pursued an enforcement and regulatory agenda to the detriment of the digital asset ecosystem.” Analysis: The battle lines of crypto supporters (led by Ritchie Torres (D-NY) and French Hill (R-AR)) vs. detractors (led by Stephen Lynch (D-MA) and Brad Sherman (D-CA)) stayed consistent in this hearing. The detractors echoed SEC Chair Gensler’s position that 1940's-era court cases on securities laws are fit for purpose in regulating the digital asset industry. On the other side, industry participants and Congressional supporters argued that updated rules would ultimately better protect consumers while keeping innovation in America. Even Maxine Waters (D-CA) responded, “That’s odd,” when learning established FinTech Robinhood attempted to follow SEC registration procedures but was denied registration without further explanation. SEC Charges DeFi Platform with Securities Law Violations: September 18, 2024 Background: The SEC has charged the creators of the Rari DeFi platform with acting as unregistered brokers. MATIC, LINK, FTM, UST, and RGT were listed as “crypto assets offered and sold as securities” in the Complaint. The Complaint and Order are vague as to whether the Agency is alleging that only the Rari-operated liquidity pools (which the Rari team would algorithmically rebalance) are what caused the violations, or if any pool (including user-created pools that Rari had no contact with other than providing a front end to access those pools) were also violations of securities laws. Analysis: Rari was literally created by high schoolers. So it shouldn’t be shocking that it suffered a protocol hack and lost $80 million. This also very likely led to upset individuals reporting them to the SEC, which started the investigation leading to these charges. The hack exposed that the protocol was DeFi in name only, as it exhibited significant centralized control beyond just the interface. DAO votes were either ignored or delayed, along with other questionable practices. Interestingly, unlike nearly all previous settlements, this one went to great lengths to avoid labeling the tokens as “digital asset securities.” This is significant, as the SEC has consistently struggled to win this argument in courts across the country. That said, this isn’t great precedent, particularly with the looming Uniswap Wells notice still outstanding. Briefly Noted: Members of Congress Ask for SEC Stance on Airdrops: Representatives Emmer and McHenry have sent a letter to SEC Chair Gensler regarding the agency’s official stance on airdropped tokens. The letter stated, “The ethos of crypto and blockchain technology is premised on decentralization. The SEC’s regulatory approach seems to make the goal of decentralization impossible to obtain. Details Emerge Regarding Collapse of Silvergate Bank: The recently filed Declaration of the then Chief Administrative Officer of Silvergate Bank (Elaine Hetric) reveals that the bank was solvent at the time of its closure, and it was only closed due to actions from financial regulators (the Federal Reserve, FDIC, and OCC), which hampered its ability to be an ongoing business. This raises troubling questions about due process and other related issues. Details Emerge Regarding Former President Trump’s Proposed DeFi Platform: It appears the proposed DeFi platform backed by former President Trump will include a Reg D/S token sale with locked tokens and no venture or presale allotment. The platform appears to primarily just be providing an attractive interface on top of existing technology with an intention to provide easy access to DeFi. The platform may find it challenging to comply with the transfer restrictions imposed under the securities law exemptions from registration that they are relying on. NFT Bill Gets Attention in House: In light of the Flyfish settlement, the Digital Chamber-backed NFT bill becomes even more critical. The bill seeks to provide clarity that digital versions of real-world assets that are not typically deemed securities do not become securities merely through tokenization. SEC Files Proposed Amended Complaint in Binance: The SEC v. Binance Amended Complaint dropped, and looking at the redline, it appears that the SEC is prepared to go forward with claims against many tokens despite early statements that its proposed amended compliant would alleviate the Court’s need to reach a determination on those issues. Also of note, the SEC complaint included a footnote about how the SEC didn’t mean that a crypto asset is necessarily a security when they previously used the phrase “crypto asset security.” Kraken Files Answer in SEC Lawsuit: The Kraken Answer in SEC v. Kraken also dropped, in which Kraken denies everything, like most answers do. The affirmative defenses are worth a close reading, especially the free speech affirmative defense claiming that the SEC is retaliating against Kraken for being critical of the SEC in certain Congressional testimony. Conclusion: As the flurry of regulatory and legislative activity surrounding digital assets continues, the upcoming weeks could be critical in shaping the future of the industry. The Congressional hearings and SEC actions discussed here illustrate the growing importance of decentralized finance, the increasing scrutiny on platforms dealing with digital assets, and the persistent friction between regulators and industry participants. With the CFTC and SEC looking to finalize their fiscal year and Congress preparing for potential action in the lame duck session, the digital asset space is poised for further developments. As always, the industry remains in a state of flux, with major legal, regulatory, and technological shifts on the horizon. If you have any questions about how the above developments affect your blockchain plans or any other questions regarding the legalities around various aspects of this rapidly developing industry, contact any member of the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team to set up a time to talk and see how we can be of assistance. Also, please subscribe to the BitBlog for alerts when new stories or updates are posted by our attorneys.

In the last few weeks, decisions by regulatory agencies and courts overseeing cryptocurrency disputes have dominated the Web3 legal news. This can be expected to continue, even as Congress comes back from its August break, as those agencies look to close out their financial year on September 30 and look to set budgets and agendas for the next year. However, with both the SEC and CFTC already embroiled in significant lawsuits against well-funded digital asset industry participants, those agencies must be feeling a strain on resources at this point. Meanwhile, settlements for actions dating back to pre-2023 conduct continue to be finalized, as both the industry participants and agencies overseeing those participants look to put prior alleged misdeeds to rest and move forward with ongoing business.    These developments and a few other brief notes are discussed below. NFT Secondary Marketplace OpenSea Receives SEC Wells Notice: August 28, 2024 Background: The NFT marketplace OpenSea has reportedly received a Wells notice from SEC staff indicating the SEC’s staff intends to recommend a lawsuit for securities law violations be brought against the platform operator. At its peak in early 2022, over $6 billion of NFT sales a month occurred on its platform, but those numbers have sharply declined as competitors like Magic Eden and Blur emerged and NFT sales generally declined. There is no word yet as to the content of the Wells notice or what NFT sales will be at issue in any action brought by the agency. Opensea has pledged $5 million in legal defense fees for any creators on the platform similarly targeted by the agency. Analysis: It is easy to imagine that the transactions alleged to be unregistered securities transactions will be sales involving Impact Theory or Stoner Cats, which the SEC has previously alleged to be securities and settled with the issuers thereof (over dissents from Commissioners Peirce and Uyeda). The charges could also stem from trades of Uniswap liquidity pool tokens or similar ERC-1155 types of tokens, which may resemble financial products. With outstanding Wells notices against Robinhood, UniSwap, and now OpenSea, there can be expected a flurry of new SEC lawsuits in the months leading up to and following the upcoming Presidential election, with Chair Gensler currently expected to leave his position at the SEC regardless of the election’s outcome. Uniswap Settles With CFTC: September 4, 2024 Background: The CFTC issued an Order filing and settled charges against Uniswap for an agreed-upon fine of $175,000. Commissioners Mersinger and Pham issued separate dissenting statements. The Order does not accuse Uniswap of creating the futures products at issue but instead states that “by operating a front-end user interface (the Interface) that facilitated and provide[d] a purchaser with the ability to source financing or leverage from other users or third parties,” Uniswap meets the definition of an “offeror” of the futures products under the applicable statute. Analysis: Anybody can still buy and sell the futures products the CFTC takes issue with by interacting directly with the application or through using a block explorer such as etherscan. The CFTC’s issue is merely with the interface provided by Uniswap, i.e., making it easier to interact with these assets. This begs the question of exactly how user-friendly a website needs to be to make it an “offeror,” according to the CFTC. Commissioner Mersinger had an especially strong dissent, stating, “This case has all the hallmarks of what we have come to know as regulation through enforcement: a settlement with a de minimis penalty that bears little relationship to the conduct alleged, sweeping statements about the broader industry that are not germane to the case at hand, and legal theories that have not been tested in court.” Coinbase Partially Wins in Discovery Dispute with the SEC: September 5, 2024 Background: Coinbase has partially won its Motion to Compel certain discoveries in the lawsuit brought against the exchange by the SEC. In an Order issued orally by Judge Failla, the Court held that “I agree with Coinbase that it should be able to defend itself against these very significant charges by obtaining at least some of the evidence it seeks in discovery. And as I have hinted at in the past, there’s a degree to which the SEC is the architect of Coinbase’s current discovery demands. By pleading the complaint as it did, it is the SEC who set the parameters of the universe of permissible discovery.” Analysis: This is just the first discovery skirmish in this high-profile litigation, and there can be expected further disputes over documents that the SEC logs as protected from discovery under the deliberative process privilege or others. The SEC also gained a partial victory in resisting efforts by Coinbase to get discovery into certain aspects of Chair Gensler’s communications. However, the SEC will be required to conduct substantial efforts at document collection, production, or privilege logging, which could limit resources the agency has to devote to other ongoing and anticipated lawsuits in the digital asset space such as those mentioned above. This discovery battle is seemingly part of a two-part strategy by Coinbase, which also has requested documents through a FOIA action in a separate court. Kalshi Predictive Markets Wins Lawsuit on Summary Judgment Against the CFTC: September 9, 2024 Background: Kalshi predictive markets won its lawsuit against the CFTC after the agency sought to block the company from offering prediction markets on U.S. election outcomes. Due to the proximity to the upcoming election, the CFTC has filed an emergency motion to stay the ruling pending an expedited appeal. Kalshi first brought this lawsuit in November of 2023, after the CFTC issued a final order, prohibiting Kalshi from offering prediction markets on certain federal elections due to Kalshi’s status as a federally regulated exchange. Analysis: CFTC Chair Behnam has made regulation of prediction markets a priority at the CFTC, with the agency proposing rulemaking regarding prediction markets earlier this year. Coinbase has commented on the CFTC’s proposal regarding the regulator entering an area that has been traditionally left to the states. Others in the space have also joined in the opposition to the CFTC’s proposed expansion of authority. While the memorandum with the reasoning for the Court’s decision has not been released yet, this could be a major blow to the agency in imposing regulations on prediction markets, which often use cryptocurrency and smart contracts to manage and settle event outcome payouts. Briefly Noted: SEC Reserves Rights to Challenge Distributions in FTX Bankruptcy: The SEC has filed a document in the FTX bankruptcy reserving the agency’s “rights to challenge transactions involving crypto assets" and specifically, payments made in stablecoins. MakerDAO Moves Towards Freezable Stablecoin: MakerDAO is moving DAI to “USDS” which will be the upgradable format of the stablecoin that has transfer and freezing functionalities that USDC and USDT have. While DAI will still exist, since all the support and liquidity will likely transfer, one of the last remaining major censorship resistant stablecoins is probably not long for this world. SEC Commissioner Calls for Crypto Registration Form: SEC Commissioner Uyeda said in a recent fireside chat that the SEC needs a custom S-1 registration form for digital asset securities. “I hope at some point, whether it’s Gensler or any of his successors, will think about, we’ve now had a fair amount of regulatory uncertainty on digital assets, maybe we ought to move forward with some legislation or rulemaking,” Uyeda said. SEC Fines Advisory Firm for Crypto Custody Failures: The SEC hit Galois Capital Management LLC with a $225,000 fine for “failing to comply with requirements related to the safeguarding of client assets, including crypto assets being offered and sold as securities.” The Order/press release does not state which of the tokens were “crypto assets that were offered and sold as securities” and thus improperly stored on FTX (or Fireblocks), so it is hard for others to know how to comply going forward based on this Order alone. Robinhood Settles with California Regulators over Prior Cryptocurrency Transfer Restrictions: Robinhood settled with the California DOJ over old (2018-2022) cryptocurrency trading restrictions.  The good thing about self-custody options is that you are not limited by the platform you buy digital assets on for where those assets can be used/sold. Robinhood has allowed users to transfer digital assets to self-custody wallets since 2022. Conclusion: The legal and regulatory landscape for the cryptocurrency and broader Web3 space remains highly dynamic, as recent actions by the SEC, CFTC, and other authorities demonstrate. With the end of the fiscal year approaching, agencies like the SEC and CFTC are pushing forward with key enforcement actions despite strained resources, while major players in the digital asset space continue to navigate ongoing litigation and regulatory uncertainty. As we move toward 2025, the outcome of these disputes—particularly those involving high-profile platforms like OpenSea and Uniswap—will have lasting implications for the future regulation of the industry. Industry participants should continue to monitor these developments closely as they may reshape how digital assets are treated under U.S. law in the coming years. If you have any questions about how the above developments affect your blockchain plans or any other questions regarding the legalities around various aspects of this rapidly developing industry, contact any member of the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team to set up a time to talk and see how we can be of assistance. Also, please subscribe to the BitBlog for alerts when new stories or updates are posted by our attorneys.

As the end of summer approaches, litigation in the digital asset industry has remained hot. In the SEC’s cases against various exchanges, ongoing discovery fights are starting to play out in court filings, and one can expect these fights to remain contentious throughout the various lawsuits. Meanwhile, the case against Ripple Labs has finally reached its conclusion (for now), and California has taken the step of being the first state to begin moving car titles to the blockchain. These developments and a few other brief notes are discussed below. Coinbase files Motion to Compel Production of Documents in Case Against SEC: July 27, 2024 Background: Coinbase has filed a Motion to Compel the SEC to produce certain documents in the agency’s case against the exchange. This comes after oral arguments on a related issue occurred, with the judge warning Coinbase against overreaching in its document requests. Coinbase is looking to compel the production of, among other things, (1) documents related to SEC meetings with Coinbase and others prior to the litigation; (2) documents related to tokens named in dispute/staking functionalities at issue; and (3) documents related to speeches Chair Gensler gave on digital assets in his personal capacity. Analysis: This is seemingly a part of a two-part strategy by Coinbase, which also has requested documents through a FOIA action in a separate court. The Hinman speech documents saw the light of day thanks to the Ripple litigation, and one can expect more documents that are unfavorable to both parties will be eventually forced to be disclosed in this action as they are in most litigation matters. The SEC has opposed the motion, and a ruling on the issue can be expected shortly with the judge fully briefed on the dispute. Artists Sue SEC Over Agency’s Position Regarding NFTs: July 29, 2024 Background: Kentucky Law professor Brian Frye and Song a Day creator Jonathan Mann have sued the SEC in a declaratory judgment action regarding determinations by the agency that NFTs can be investment contracts that require registration with the SEC prior to sale. Professor Frye had previously released a contemporary art project where he sold NFT copies of his no-action letter to the SEC regarding this topic, which the SEC did not respond to. Analysis: It is slightly disappointing that the Plaintiffs in this case did not bring up the prior restraint on free speech or other arguments from the Original Public Meaning of Investment Contract article by Edward Lee, but still an interesting Complaint to read, complete with pictures. The Taylor Swift tickets are a great example of how entitlement to future benefits does not equal investment contract, even if they can be sold for profits based on efforts of the artist. Also highlighting the damages in the SEC’s cases thus far have included burning the art at issue was a nice touch. SEC Plans to Seek Leave to Amend Complaint Against Binance Regarding Certain Token Sales: July 30, 2024 Background: The SEC filed a document in the case against Binance stating the agency’s intent to seek leave to amend its Complaint against various Binance entities “including with respect to the ‘Third Party Crypto Asset Securities’” which the SEC originally named as SOL, ADA, MATIC, FIL, ATOM, SAND, MANA, ALGO, AXS and COTI. It is unclear what those amendments will be, but the SEC claims it will “obviate[e] the need for the Court to issue a ruling as to the sufficiency of the allegations as to those tokens at this time.” Analysis: On July 11, the Court held a hearing on whether the claims regarding third-party tokens other than BNB survived after the Court dismissed allegations regarding secondary trading of the Binance-issued token. At least one of the tokens named (MATIC) has a migration in the works, which could hamper the SEC’s claims for injunctive relief as to that token as currently pled. We will need to wait until there is an actual proposed Amended Complaint to determine how the SEC is planning to address the secondary sales ruling regarding BNB in its strategy regarding the currently remaining tokens at issue. This seemingly strategic retreat by the SEC very likely has something to do with the ongoing discovery fight in Coinbase discussed above over documents regarding secondary tokens named. Damages Ruling Issued in Ripple Labs Lawsuit: July 30, 2024 Background: Ripple Labs was issued a civil penalty of $125,035,150 for illegal sales of securities in the form of $XRP tokens and other contractual arrangements (a total of 1,278 transactions) with institutional investors, falling short of the roughly $2 billion that the SEC was seeking in the action. This comes after the same Court ruled that blind bid/ask sales of the digital asset $XRP were not securities transactions. This is now a final judgment in the action, so it can be expected both sides will appeal certain aspects of the various rulings in the case. Analysis: While it’s hard to look at a 9-figure damage number and call it a win, this was objectively a win for Ripple. This is the first time the SEC litigated to a final judgment against a digital asset industry participant without the end result being a complete shutdown of the development company. While there will be appeals and the litigation will continue, Ripple was one of the most aggressive with their initial coin offering (ICO) and has one of the more centralized validator sets out of most current major blockchain projects with a token, so seemingly a win for the industry as a whole as well. Briefly Noted: IRS Updates Crypto Brokerage Form: The IRS has updated its crypto brokerage tax form 1099-DA. Form 1099-DA, which monitors "digital asset proceeds from broker transactions," is slated to go at least partially into effect in 2025. Prior drafts of the form required individuals to submit a digital wallet address and to note whether assets are a "non-covered security,” both of which appear to be removed in the current draft form. Senate Bill to Form Bitcoin Strategic Reserve Published: Senator Lummis has submitted a bill to have the United States buy Bitcoin as a strategic reserve. As explained by the Senator, “[t]he BITCOIN Act establishes a strategic Bitcoin reserve to serve as an additional store of value to bolster America’s balance sheet and ensure the transparent management of Bitcoin holdings of the federal government.” BitClout Founder Charged With Criminal and Civil Fraud: The once pseudonymous BitClout founder “Diamondhands” (AKA, Nader Al-Naji) has been charged with civil and criminal fraud by the SEC and DOJ. The former Thirty-Under-Thirty award winner will face charges related to capital formation efforts and statements he made regarding the functionalities of the platform he was building. California Moves Car Titling to the Blockchain: California is moving car title tracking to the blockchain. California's Department of Motor Vehicles has digitized 42 million car titles and will allow the transfer of those titles to occur on the Avalanche blockchain. Industry Actors Oppose CFTC Proposed Prediction Market Rules: Coinbase has commented to the CFTC’s proposal regarding the CFTC’s propose to regulate prediction markets, something that has traditionally been left to the states to regulate. Others in the space have also joined in the opposition to the CFTC’s proposed expansion of authority. Mango Markets Alleged Exploiter Seeks New Trial: Avraham 'Avi' Eisenberg has requested a new trial and for his conviction to be overturned in the case against him regarding his alleged exploit of decentralized finance platform, Mango Markets. The issues on venue shopping and how there can be “fraud” against automated computer code are worth watching and likely will be raised on appeal regardless of which side wins on those issues. Conclusion: As we move toward the end of summer, the digital asset industry continues to be a focal point of intense litigation and regulatory scrutiny. The recent developments in the SEC’s ongoing cases against major exchanges, the conclusion of the Ripple Labs lawsuit, and California’s innovative step to move car titles to the blockchain all highlight the dynamic and rapidly evolving nature of this space. With discovery disputes heating up in the courts and new legislative initiatives emerging, the intersection of law, technology, and digital assets remains a critical area to watch. As these cases progress, they will likely shape the regulatory landscape and influence the future of digital assets in profound ways. The outcomes will not only impact the entities involved but also set precedents that could define the industry’s legal framework for years to come. If you have any questions about how the above developments affect your blockchain plans or any other questions regarding the legalities around various aspects of this rapidly developing industry, contact any member of the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team to set up a time to talk and see how we can be of assistance. Also, please subscribe to the BitBlog for alerts when new stories or updates are posted by our attorneys.

Our last update included a whirlwind of activities, with the surprisingly bipartisan House of Representatives vote on FIT 21 and the SEC’s approval of certain Ether spot ETF rule change proposals coming in quick succession. This update is back to business as usual: pending industry litigation continues to move toward a final resolution, and the President made good on his promise to veto a bill that would have reopened the door for most banks to be able to take custody of digital assets. These developments and a few other brief notes are discussed below. President Biden Vetoes Bill to Overturn Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 (“SAB 121”): May 31, 2024 Background: President Biden went through with his threat and vetoed the bipartisan bill that passed the House and Senate to overturn Staff Accounting Bulletin 121. The bill would have repealed the SEC’s accounting guidance requiring SEC-registered companies to treat digital assets held on behalf of customers as liabilities, effectively making it infeasible for most banks to meet other regulatory requirements if they custody digital assets. This veto came after a bipartisan group of lawmakers urged President Biden not to go through with his threat to veto the measure. Analysis: President Biden’s statement that “[m]y Administration is eager to work with Congress to ensure a comprehensive and balanced regulatory framework for digital assets” seemingly rings hollow in a statement where he is vetoing a bill that had bipartisan sponsorship and passed with 60 votes (including Chuck Schumer) in a Democrat-controlled Senate. SAB 121 is internal SEC guidance that the Government Accountability Office has already determined failed to abide by the Administrative Procedures Act. It is also unclear how taking away trusted custodial options protects consumers. After a few weeks where it looked like the Administration may have started to reverse course on crypto policies, which are increasingly becoming a wedge issue for the upcoming election, it was disappointing to see the veto of a bill that had the backing of traditional banks and digital asset industry participants alike. Coinbase Finalizing Briefing in Rulemaking Appeal: May 31, 2024 Background: Coinbase has now completed its briefing in its appeal of the SEC’s denial of rulemaking, filing the Reply in Support of its Petition. The head of legal at Coinbase summarized their filing on Twitter, claiming “[t]he SEC is bent on choking the digital asset industry and is refusing to provide the necessary rules the industry has requested in order to tighten the squeeze.” Analysis: Coinbase faces an uphill battle on this, as Congress has not mandated that the SEC pass any such rulemaking. Best case scenario for the industry would be the Court forcing the agency’s hand, but it would still be a massive win if this results in dicta regarding the inability of digital asset participants to abide by existing rules. For those who missed it, it is worth reading the Paradigm three-part series on why “come in and register” is not possible, with citations to specific rules and reasoning. Dapper Labs Settled NBA Top Shot Securities Class Action Background: Dapper has agreed to a tentative settlement of $4 million in the class action alleging the sale of NBA Top Shot NFTs were securities transactions. While the settlement still needs to be approved by the Court, if this stands, it seems like a good result for the company after losing its Motion to Dismiss largely due to the Court finding the centralized flow blockchain makes certain securities arguments issues of fact for trial. Dapper would have likely spent more than $4 million in litigation and discovery if taken to trial, so this is an easy out for them. Analysis: Dapper gets liability protection for all sales from when it was the only market in town to buy and sell their NFTs and can now use the existence of additional marketplaces as a defense for lawsuits going forward. It seems like a win for Dapper, as $4 million should barely make a dent in the company’s bottom line. Dapper CEO Roham released a tweet claiming the settlement affirms that it was agreed that Flow blockchain was a decentralized public network and Top Shot NFTs are not securities. Briefly Noted: SEC Private Funds Rule Overturned by 5th Circuit: The Fifth Circuit vacated the private fund adviser rules that would have greatly increased compliance burdens and overhead for many fund managers. These would have applied to registered investment advisers to private funds and may have disproportionately affected crypto venture managers, most of whom cannot rely on the venture capital fund adviser exemption from registration. Our detailed alert is available here. Industry Players Back Super PAC: Coinbase has also now donated $25 million to crypto super PAC Fairshake, bringing its funding up to $75 million from Coinbase, Ripple, and a16z alone. Fairshake is a PAC that supports crypto-friendly candidates through funding, research, and advertisements. In the latest Harris poll, 33% of respondents said they take into consideration a candidate’s stance on crypto, and 77% believe a U.S. presidential candidate should have an informed perspective on crypto. House Subcommittee Hold Hearing on Tokenization of Assets: The House Financial Services Subcommittee on Digital Assets held a hearing regarding the tokenization of real-world assets. While the hearing had notable detractors, most of the focus was on the various benefits for cheaper and faster settlements and improved transparency that the integration of blockchain technologies into transactions can offer. SEC Faces Lawsuit on Document Request Responses: The American Securities Association has filed a lawsuit against the SEC in the Middle District of Florida alleging the agency has failed to comply with certain Freedom of Information Act requests regarding the agency’s enforcement actions of off-channel broker/dealer communications during COVID when those individuals were unexpectedly shifted to work from home. This is added to the list of declaratory judgment actions taken against the agency. Robinhood Purchases Crypto Exchange Bitstamp: Robinhood is buying crypto exchange Bitstamp to expand crypto operations outside of the United States. It appears companies are shifting focus and funding outside of the United States, with American industry regulation still in flux, unlike in other countries. DOJ Bring Charges Against Alleged NFT Rug Pull Founders: The DOJ is prosecuting the guys behind the alleged 2021 NFT rug pull “Evolved Apes.” While there were plenty of similar projects around that time, these guys likely got a target on their backs after Vice covered the alleged scam. Treasury Releases Findings on Study of NFTs and Illicit Finance: Treasury released their study on the use of NFTs in illicit finance, and the findings are essentially that criminals launder money with anything of value, including NFTs, but that NFTs are not a primary means of illicit financing. Members of Congress Call for Action in Matter of Jailed Binance Executive: Fifteen members of Congress have signed a letter urging executive action to bring home detained U.S. citizen/Binance executive Tigran Gambaryan. This came the same week as former Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao (“CZ”) began serving his sentence in the United States for certain anti-money laundering violations. Conclusion: As the whirlwind of recent legislative and regulatory activity settles, the cryptocurrency industry braces for continued challenges and opportunities. President Biden's veto of the bill to overturn Staff Accounting Bulletin 121 underscores the complexities facing digital asset regulation, while Coinbase's ongoing battle with the SEC and Dapper Labs' settlement in the NBA Top Shot securities class action highlight the legal landscape's evolving nature. Meanwhile, industry players rally behind initiatives like the Fairshake super PAC, signaling a growing influence in political spheres. As Congressional hearings delve into the tokenization of assets and lawsuits challenge regulatory actions, the path forward remains uncertain yet ripe with potential for innovation and growth. If you have any questions about how the above developments affect your blockchain plans or any other questions regarding the legalities around various aspects of this rapidly developing industry, contact any member of the Polsinelli Blockchain+ team to set up a time to talk and see how we can be of assistance. Also, please subscribe to the BitBlog for alerts when new stories or updates are posted by our attorneys.

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) was one of the first United States regulators to provide guidance on the tax treatment of virtual currencies such as Bitcoin. Starting back in 2014 with its release of Internal Revenue Bulletin: 2014-16, the IRS stated that bitcoin is taxed as a property. Then in 2019, the IRS addressed the tax implications of a hard fork in Revenue Ruling 2019-24. Mindful of the continued expansion and transition of this industry, the IRS released draft filing instructions for the 2022 Form 1040, U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, on October 17, 2022.  The draft instructions provide further clarity that IRS guidance applies to the full spectrum of what are called “digital assets” and address how digital assets should be reported on U.S. tax returns. The draft instructions to the 2022 Form 1040 indicate that the term “virtual currency” is now being supplemented with a broader term, “digital assets.” Since 2019, the Form 1040 has included a question regarding virtual currency requiring filers to check ‘yes’ or ‘no’ to disclose whether they had engaged in any transactions involving virtual currency during the tax year. The draft instructions now expand this disclosure to include all digital assets, “Virtual currency” is defined as: “…a digital representation of value, other than a representation of the U.S. dollar or a foreign currency (“real currency”), that functions as a unit of account, a store of value, or a medium of exchange.” The new “digital assets” definition highlights the IRS’ attempts to catch up with the evolving landscape and vastly broadens the scope of this question. Specifically, the IRS defines digital assets as: “…any digital representations of value that are recorded on a cryptographically secured distributed ledger or any similar technology. For example, digital assets include non-fungible tokens (NFTs) and virtual currencies, such as cryptocurrencies and stablecoins. If a particular asset has the characteristics of a digital asset, it will be treated as a digital asset for federal income tax purposes.” The IRS’ definition of digital assets explicitly includes Non-fungible Tokens (“NFTs”). The IRS’ inclusion of NFTs seems to signal that the IRS plans to treat NFTs like other digital assets rather than as artworks or collectibles, as some may have preferred. However, the IRS has not said anything explicitly in this regard and whether the IRS will tax the sale of NFT collectibles at a lower rate than physical collectibles is yet to be seen. In addition to providing an expanded definition of digital assets, the IRS has provided additional guidance on when to check ‘yes’ in response to the IRS’ question of whether or not the taxpayer has engaged in any transactions involving cryptocurrency. According to the draft 2022 Form 1040, the question will read: “At any time during 2022, did you: (a) receive (as a reward, award, or payment for property or services); or (b) sell, exchange, gift, or otherwise dispose of a digital asset (or a financial interest in a digital asset)? (See instructions).” In addition to the inclusion of transactions that involve NFTs in the IRS requirement to check a box on Form 1040, the IRS’ question, as revised also captures other transactions that involve digital assets such as “play-to-earn-games” where taxpayers may earn digital assets. These additional instructions provided by the IRS raise several questions and concerns for tax professionals and for taxpayers. One question is given the broad scope of digital assets, why should the mere fact that a transaction is “cryptography secured” require it to be looked at differently on a tax form?  Another – Is it fair to add additional regulatory burdens on transactions simply for attempting to be more secure and transparent? The update to the form instructions is a signal that the IRS is trying to stay mindful of the developments occurring in the realm of digital assets and working to further enhance the government’s overall enforcement strategy from an income tax reporting perspective. With the adoption of this broader language, we hope that further regulatory guidance will be forthcoming and without that, we recommend taking a conversative and inclusive approach for any filing.