Matters

  • Representing plaintiff in litigations related to wireless site structural components. Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Better Metal, LLC, 3-26-cv-00299 (MDTN); Valmont Industries, Inc. v. Amphenol Corporation et al., 1-25-cv-01364 (DDE).
  • Representing contractor in litigation related to road and bridge construction technology. Raptor LLC v. Johnson Bros. Corporation et al., 9:26-cv-80203-EA (S.D. Fla.).
  • Representing bitcoin mining operator in litigation related to breach of contract claims. Jigowatt, LLC et al. v. RK Industries, LLC et al., 4:24-cv-03188-JMG-JMD (D. Neb.).
  • Representing respondent in ITC investigation related to liquid crystal display technology. Liquid Crystal Devices, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-1462 (ITC).
  • Represented plaintiffs in litigation related to trademark infringement and unfair competition. Aroma360 LLC and Hotel Collection LLC v. Scentiment LLC, 24-25031-CMA (S.D. Fla.).
  • Represented defendant in litigation related to trade secret misappropriation. Pulse Therapeutics, Inc. v. UNandUP, LLC, et al., 24SL-CC04166 (St. Louis Cnty. Cir. Ct.).
  • Represented respondent in an ITC investigation related to video coding technology. Certain Cellular Base Station Communication Equipment, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-1388 (ITC).
  • Represented complainant in an ITC investigation related to video coding technology. Certain Electronic Computing Devices, and Components and Modules Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1387 (ITC).
  • Represented complainant in ITC investigations related to video coding technology. Certain Video Capable Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Streaming Devices, Televisions, and Components and Modules Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1380 (ITC); Video Capable Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Streaming Devices, Televisions, Cameras, and Components and Modules Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-1379 (ITC).
  • Represented complainant in an ITC investigation related to video coding technology. Electronic Devices, Including Mobile Phones, Tablets, Laptops, Components Thereof, and Products Containing the Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-1376 (ITC).
  • Represented complainant in an ITC investigation related to video coding technology. Mobile Phones, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Inv. No. 337-TA-1375 (ITC).
  • Counsel to global telecommunications company in an inter partes review proceeding related to wireless over-the-air updates. IPR-2024-00135 (PTAB).
  • Represented global telecommunications company in patent litigations related to video coding technology. Nokia Technologies Oy v. HP Inc. f/k/a Hewlett-Packard Company, 1-23-cv-01237 (D. Del.); Nokia Technologies Oy v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al., 1-23-cv-01236 (D. Del.); Nokia Corporation et al v. Amazon.com, Inc., 1-23-cv-01232 (D. Del.).
  • Represented U.S. fiber optic company in patent litigation related to high density optical interconnects. Senko Advanced Components, Inc. v. US Conec Ltd., 1-23-cv-00083 (D. Del.).
  • Represented global technology company in Western District of Texas patent litigation related to online advertising. Adnexus Incorporated, LLC v. Meta Platforms, Inc. f/k/a Facebook, Inc., 6-23-cv-00152 (W.D. Tex.).
  • Represented global digital payments company in patent litigation related to networking and online payment systems. Implicit, LLC v. PayPal Holdings, Inc. et al., 6-22-cv-00686 (W.D. Tex.).
  • Counsel to global technology company in multiple inter partes review proceedings related to semiconductors. IPR2023-00506, IPR2023-00597, IPR2023-00509, IPR2023-00510 (PTAB).
  • Represented global telecommunications company in patent litigation related to 4G & 5G technology. Godo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson et al., 2-21-cv-00213 (E.D. Tex.).
  • Represented complainant in ITC investigation related to video coding technology. Certain Electronic Devices, Including Computers, Tablet Computers, and Components and Modules Thereof; 337-TA-1208 (ITC).
  • Represented global telecommunications company in patent litigation related to 3G & 4G technology. IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG v. Sprint Spectrum L.P. et al., 2-20-cv-00321 (EDTX); IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG v. AT&T Inc et al., 2-20-cv-00322 (EDTX); IPCom Gmbh & Co. KG v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al., 2-20-cv-00323 (E.D. Tex.).
  • Counsel to global telecommunications company in inter partes review proceedings related to 3G & 4G technology.
  • Represented global telecommunications company in six inter partes review proceedings involving patents related to pixel motion prediction.
  • Represented global telecommunications company in a dispute over FRAND obligations and patent licensing issues.
  • Represented global animal health company in patent litigation in the District of New Jersey involving patents related to vaccines for preventing porcine circovirus infection in piglets.
  • Counsel to micro-entity applying for a patent before the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office related to towing assemblies.
  • Represented global telecommunications company in patent litigation involving patents relating to networking. Sable Networks, Inc. et al v. Nokia Corp. et al., 6-20-cv-00808 (W.D. Tex.).
  • Represented national automotive retailer in patent litigation before the Federal Circuit involving patents related to smart phone connectivity. KCG Technologies LLC v. CarMax Auto Superstores Inc., et al., No. 20-1327 (Fed. Cir.).
  • Counsel to national arms manufacturer in inter partes review proceedings involving patents related to multistage triggers. IPR2020-00373 (PTAB).